Universitat de Barcelona
2020-03-30T11:18:47Z
2020-03-30T11:18:47Z
2013
2020-03-30T11:18:47Z
Thomas Kelly has argued that the Equal Weight View of peer disagreement is committed both to belief revision and to the Uniqueness Thesis, which claims that for any hypothesis H and a total body of evidence e, there is some one-doxastic attitude that is uniquely rational to adopt towards H. I rebut both theses and I also defend the view that in Kelly's case the Uniqueness Thesis doesn't require belief revision.
Article
Versió publicada
Anglès
Teoria del coneixement; Creença i dubte; Theory of knowledge; Belief and doubt
University of Kent
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://research.kent.ac.uk/reasoning/wp-content/uploads/sites/581/2019/06/TheReasoner-71-screen.pdf
The Reasoner, 2013, vol. 7, num. 1, p. 4-5
(c) Palmira, Michele, 2013
Filosofia [707]
