Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitors in refractory colorectal cancer: deciphering the myth of synthetic lethality

dc.contributor.author
Rojas, Mariam
dc.contributor.author
Gonzalez, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Cascante i Serratosa, Marta
dc.contributor.author
Maurel Santasusana, Joan
dc.date.accessioned
2026-02-03T19:23:56Z
dc.date.available
2026-02-03T19:23:56Z
dc.date.issued
2026-02-02T17:50:05Z
dc.date.issued
2026-02-02T17:50:05Z
dc.date.issued
2024-08-25
dc.date.issued
2026-02-02T17:50:06Z
dc.identifier
3005-6152
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/226564
dc.identifier
755096
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/226564
dc.description.abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a highly lethal disease because resistance to chemotherapy and targeted agents—including anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR therapies—emerges rapidly and universally. In RAS‑mutant mCRC, second-line treatment with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab achieves modest clinical benefit, underscoring the need to understand mechanisms of resistance and develop rational combination strategies. Recent evidence implicates oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), antioxidant programs such as the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), and polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1)–dependent cell‑cycle regulation as key determinants of therapeutic refractoriness. In a recent phase Ib study, onvansertib, a PLK1 inhibitor, combined with FOLFIRI and bevacizumab produced a notable 44% response rate and a median progression-free survival of 12.6 months in RAS‑mutant tumors, suggesting a subset of patients may derive meaningful benefit. Integrating these clinical findings with current metabolic and genomic insights, we highlight how OXPHOS‑driven tumors activate antioxidant networks, sustain chromosome instability, and remodel nutrient usage—features that may blunt synthetic lethality and foster resistance to DNA‑damaging agents, PARP inhibitors, and PLK1 inhibition. We also discuss how altered DNA‑repair reliance (HR, NHEJ, and MMEJ), lactate‑supported mitochondrial metabolism, ENPP1‑mediated immunosuppression, and MYC activation converge to shape chemoresistance and impaired immune responses in microsatellite‑stable colorectal cancer. A more precise therapeutic approach may require selecting patients with combined OXPHOS and PPP activation and leveraging rational combinations involving PLK1, PARP, or ENPP1 inhibitors together with immune checkpoint blockade. Such strategies could enhance the efficacy of ongoing clinical trials and refine future treatment paradigms for heavily pretreated colorectal cancer.
dc.format
5 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
AME Publishing Company
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.21037/actr-24-68
dc.relation
AME Clinical Trials Review, 2024, vol. 2, p. 1-5
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.21037/actr-24-68
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) AME Publishing Company, 2024
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject
Càncer colorectal
dc.subject
Quimioteràpia del càncer
dc.subject
Colorectal cancer
dc.subject
Cancer chemotherapy
dc.title
Polo-like kinase 1 inhibitors in refractory colorectal cancer: deciphering the myth of synthetic lethality
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.