2022-03-11T15:57:38Z
2022-03-11T15:57:38Z
2021-08-01
2022-03-11T15:57:38Z
t: Purpose: To evaluate interobserver and intertest agreement between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and retinography in the detection of glaucoma through a telemedicine program. Methods: A stratified sample of 4113 individuals was randomly selected, and those who accepted underwent examination including visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), non-mydriatic retinography, and imaging using a portable OCT device. Participants' data and images were uploaded and assessed by 16 ophthalmologists on a deferred basis. Two independent evaluations were performed for all participants. Agreement between methods was assessed using the kappa coefficient and the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). We analyzed potential factors possibly influencing the level of agreement. Results: The final sample comprised 1006 participants. Of all suspected glaucoma cases (n = 201), 20.4% were identified in retinographs only, 11.9% in OCT images only, 46.3% in both, and 21.4% were diagnosed based on other data. Overall interobserver agreement outcomes were moderate to good with a kappa coefficient of 0.37 and a PABAK index of 0.58. Higher values were obtained by experienced evaluators (kappa = 0.61; PABAK = 0.82). Kappa and PABAK values between OCT and photographs were 0.52 and 0.82 for the first evaluation. Conclusion: In a telemedicine screening setting, interobserver agreement on diagnosis was moderate but improved with greater evaluator expertise.
Artículo
Versión publicada
Inglés
Cribratge; Glaucoma; Tomografia de coherència òptica; Telecomunicació en medicina; Medical screening; Glaucoma; Optical coherence tomography; Telecommunication in medicine
MDPI
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153337
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2021, vol. 10, num. 15, p. 1-13
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153337
cc-by (c) Anton, Alfonso et al., 2021
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/