dc.contributor.author
Mauri, Margarita
dc.date.issued
2020-11-23T09:36:10Z
dc.date.issued
2020-05-22
dc.date.issued
2020-11-23T09:36:10Z
dc.date.issued
info:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2099-12-31
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/172288
dc.description.abstract
The contemporary recovery of the concept of 'virtue' has given rise to a fruitful research on how to define and relate virtue to other concepts and areas. Under the name of virtue ethics, authors from different perspectives consider virtue to be an essential element of moral philosophy, since it fulfills the task of explaining the human moral dimension. Many of these authors share the intention to deal with virtue by isolating the concept of the set of notions that could contribute to its full explanation. The purpose of this paper is to review some of the contemporary definitions of 'virtue' to show that they are insufficient to define its nature
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Aletheia. Associação Científica e Cultural
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2020_76_1_0049
dc.relation
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 2020, vol. 76, num. 1, p. 49-60
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2020_76_1_0049
dc.rights
(c) Aletheia. Associação Científica e Cultural, 2020
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)
dc.title
Neovirtud. Las insuficiencias de la recuperación de un concepto
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
