Sneaky Assertions

Publication date

2020-03-31T09:48:04Z

2020-12-31T06:10:20Z

2018-12-31

2020-03-31T09:48:04Z

Abstract

Some speech acts are made indirectly. It is thus natural to think that assertions could also be made indirectly. Grice's conversational implicatures appear to be just a case of this, in which one indirectly makes an assertion or a related constative act by means of a declarative sentence. Several arguments, however, have been given against indirect assertions, by Davis (1999), Fricker (2012), Green (2007, 2015), Lepore & Stone (2010, 2015) and others. This paper confronts and rejects three considerations that have been made: arguments based on the distinction between lying and misleading; arguments based on the ordinary concept of assertion; and arguments based on the testimonial knowledge that assertions provide.

Document Type

Article


Accepted version

Language

English

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons

Related items

Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12116

Philosophical Perspectives, 2018, vol. 32, num. 1, p. 188-218

https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12116

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

(c) John Wiley & Sons, 2018

This item appears in the following Collection(s)