2020-01-08T15:08:55Z
2020-01-08T15:08:55Z
2019-07-05
2020-01-08T15:08:55Z
Analysis of mutational signatures is becoming routine in cancer genomics, with implications for pathogenesis, classification, prognosis, and even treatment decisions. However, the field lacks a consensus on analysis and result interpretation. Using whole-genome sequencing of multiple myeloma (MM), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and acute myeloid leukemia, we compare the performance of public signature analysis tools. We describe caveats and pitfalls of de novo signature extraction and fitting approaches, reporting on common inaccuracies: erroneous signature assignment, identification of localized hyper-mutational processes, overcalling of signatures. We provide reproducible solutions to solve these issues and use orthogonal approaches to validate our results. We show how a comprehensive mutational signature analysis may provide relevant biological insights, reporting evidence of c-AID activity among unmutated CLL cases or the absence of BRCA1/BRCA2-mediated homologous recombination deficiency in a MM cohort. Finally, we propose a general analysis framework to ensure production of accurate and reproducible mutational signature data.
Artículo
Versión publicada
Inglés
Leucèmia mieloide; Mutació (Biologia); ADN; Myeloid leukemia; Mutation (Biology); DNA
Nature Publishing Group
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11037-8
Nature Communications, 2019, vol. 10, p. 2969
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11037-8
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/817997/EU//bECOMiNG
cc-by (c) Maura, Francesco et al., 2019
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es