Availability and use of molecular microbiological and immunological tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in Europe

Fecha de publicación

2018-03-28T14:10:12Z

2018-03-28T14:10:12Z

2014-06-12

2018-03-28T14:10:12Z

Resumen

INTRODUCTION: Currently only limited data exist regarding the availability and clinical use of molecular and immunological tests for tuberculosis (TB) in the European setting. METHODS: Web-based survey of Paediatric-Tuberculosis-Network-European-Trialsgroup (ptbnet) and Tuberculosis-Network-European-Trialsgroup (TBnet) members conducted June to December 2013. Both networks comprise clinicians, microbiologists, epidemiologists and researchers predominately based in Europe. RESULTS: 191 healthcare professionals from 31 European countries participated. Overall, 26.8% of respondents did not have access to the Xpert MTB/RIF assay; only 44.6% had access to the assay in-house. However, a substantial proportion had access to other commercial and/or non-commercial PCR-based assays for TB (68.8% and 31.8%, respectively). Only 6.4% did not have access to any PCR-based assays for TB. A large proportion of participants with access to the Xpert MTB/RIF assay had used it for the analysis of non-respiratory samples [pleural fluid: 36.5%, gastric aspirates: 34.7%, cerebrospinal fluid: 34.7%, stool samples: 4.3%, blood/serum: 2.6%, 'other samples' (which included biopsy/tissue samples, lymph node aspirates, joint aspirates and urine samples): 16.5%]. Regarding interferon-gamma release assays, a greater proportion of respondents had access to the QuantiFERON-TB Gold assay (84.7%) than to the T-SPOT.TB assay (52.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Both immunological and molecular TB tests are widely available across Europe. The QuantiFERON-TB Gold assay is more widely used than the T-SPOT.TB assay, which may reflect the difficulties of integrating an ELISPOT assay into the routine laboratory setting. Although Xpert MTB/RIF assays are optimised and solely licensed for the analysis of sputum samples, in clinical practice they are commonly used for non-respiratory samples. Further research is needed to establish how current molecular TB tests impact on patient care and outcome in the routine clinical setting.

Tipo de documento

Artículo


Versión publicada

Lengua

Inglés

Publicado por

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Documentos relacionados

Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099129

PLoS One, 2014, vol. 9, num. 6, p. e99-e129

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099129

Citación recomendada

Esta citación se ha generado automáticamente.

Derechos

cc-by (c) Tebruegge, Marc et al., 2014

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)