dc.contributor.author
Tebruegge, Marc
dc.contributor.author
Ritz, Nicole
dc.contributor.author
Koetz, Karsten
dc.contributor.author
Noguera Julian, Antoni
dc.contributor.author
Seddon, James A.
dc.contributor.author
Welch, Steven B.
dc.contributor.author
Tsolia, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Kampmann, Beate
dc.date.issued
2018-03-28T14:10:12Z
dc.date.issued
2018-03-28T14:10:12Z
dc.date.issued
2014-06-12
dc.date.issued
2018-03-28T14:10:12Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/121198
dc.description.abstract
INTRODUCTION: Currently only limited data exist regarding the availability and clinical use of molecular and immunological tests for tuberculosis (TB) in the European setting. METHODS: Web-based survey of Paediatric-Tuberculosis-Network-European-Trialsgroup (ptbnet) and Tuberculosis-Network-European-Trialsgroup (TBnet) members conducted June to December 2013. Both networks comprise clinicians, microbiologists, epidemiologists and researchers predominately based in Europe. RESULTS: 191 healthcare professionals from 31 European countries participated. Overall, 26.8% of respondents did not have access to the Xpert MTB/RIF assay; only 44.6% had access to the assay in-house. However, a substantial proportion had access to other commercial and/or non-commercial PCR-based assays for TB (68.8% and 31.8%, respectively). Only 6.4% did not have access to any PCR-based assays for TB. A large proportion of participants with access to the Xpert MTB/RIF assay had used it for the analysis of non-respiratory samples [pleural fluid: 36.5%, gastric aspirates: 34.7%, cerebrospinal fluid: 34.7%, stool samples: 4.3%, blood/serum: 2.6%, 'other samples' (which included biopsy/tissue samples, lymph node aspirates, joint aspirates and urine samples): 16.5%]. Regarding interferon-gamma release assays, a greater proportion of respondents had access to the QuantiFERON-TB Gold assay (84.7%) than to the T-SPOT.TB assay (52.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Both immunological and molecular TB tests are widely available across Europe. The QuantiFERON-TB Gold assay is more widely used than the T-SPOT.TB assay, which may reflect the difficulties of integrating an ELISPOT assay into the routine laboratory setting. Although Xpert MTB/RIF assays are optimised and solely licensed for the analysis of sputum samples, in clinical practice they are commonly used for non-respiratory samples. Further research is needed to establish how current molecular TB tests impact on patient care and outcome in the routine clinical setting.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099129
dc.relation
PLoS One, 2014, vol. 9, num. 6, p. e99-e129
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099129
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Tebruegge, Marc et al., 2014
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques)
dc.subject
Microbiologia mèdica
dc.subject
Diagnòstic molecular
dc.subject
Medical microbiology
dc.subject
Molecular diagnosis
dc.title
Availability and use of molecular microbiological and immunological tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in Europe
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion