dc.contributor.author
Hjelmso, Mathis Hjort
dc.contributor.author
Hellmér, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Fernández Cassi, Xavier
dc.contributor.author
Timoneda Solé, Natàlia
dc.contributor.author
Lukjancenko, Oksana
dc.contributor.author
Seidel, Michael
dc.contributor.author
Elsässer, Dennis
dc.contributor.author
Aarestrup, Frank M.
dc.contributor.author
Löfström, Charlotta
dc.contributor.author
Bofill Mas, Silvia
dc.contributor.author
Abril Ferrando, Josep Francesc, 1970-
dc.contributor.author
Gironès Llop, Rosina
dc.contributor.author
Schultz, Anna Charlotte
dc.date.issued
2018-02-19T11:52:31Z
dc.date.issued
2018-02-19T11:52:31Z
dc.date.issued
2017-01-18
dc.date.issued
2018-02-19T11:52:31Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/119971
dc.description.abstract
Viral sewage metagenomics is a novel field of study used for surveillance, epidemiological studies, and evaluation of waste water treatment efficiency. In raw sewage human waste is mixed with household, industrial and drainage water, and virus particles are, therefore, only found in low concentrations. This necessitates a step of sample concentration to allow for sensitive virus detection. Additionally, viruses harbor a large diversity of both surface and genome structures, which makes universal viral genomic extraction difficult. Current studies have tackled these challenges in many different ways employing a wide range of viral concentration and extraction procedures. However, there is limited knowledge of the efficacy and inherent biases associated with these methods in respect to viral sewage metagenomics, hampering the development of this field. By the use of next generation sequencing this study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of four commonly applied viral concentrations techniques (precipitation with polyethylene glycol, organic flocculation with skim milk, monolithic adsorption filtration and glass wool filtration) and extraction methods (Nucleospin RNA XS, QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit, NucliSENS® miniMAG®, or PowerViral® Environmental RNA/DNA Isolation Kit) to determine the viriome in a sewage sample. We found a significant influence of concentration and extraction protocols on the detected viriome. The viral richness was largest in samples extracted with QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit or PowerViral® Environmental RNA/DNA Isolation Kit. Highest viral specificity were found in samples concentrated by precipitation with polyethylene glycol or extracted with Nucleospin RNA XS. Detection of viral pathogens depended on the method used. These results contribute to the understanding of method associated biases, within the field of viral sewage metagenomics, making evaluation of the current literature easier and helping with the design of future studies.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170199
dc.relation
PLoS One, 2017, vol. 12, num. 1, p. e0170199
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170199
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/643476/EU//COMPARE
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Hjelmsø, M. H. et al., 2017
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)
dc.subject
Genètica molecular
dc.subject
Aigües residuals
dc.subject
Molecular genetics
dc.title
Evaluation of methods for the concentration and extraction of viruses from sewage in the context of metagenomic sequencing
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion