From principles to practice: Use of fairness and ambition considerations in nationally determined contributions

dc.contributor.author
Herrera González, Oliver
dc.contributor.author
Alcaraz Sendra, Olga
dc.contributor.author
Sureda Carbonell, Bàrbara
dc.date.accessioned
2026-02-11T01:40:00Z
dc.date.available
2026-02-11T01:40:00Z
dc.date.issued
2026-02
dc.identifier
Herrera González, O.; Alcaraz Sendra, O.; Sureda Carbonell, B. From principles to practice: Use of fairness and ambition considerations in nationally determined contributions. A: «Sostenibilitat, Disseny, Ciència i Tecnologia: la recerca actual del Departament d'Enginyeria Gràfica i de Disseny». OmniaScience, 2026, p. 129-142. ISBN 978-84-129686-6-8. DOI 10.3926/ege2026 .
dc.identifier
978-84-129686-6-8
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2117/454281
dc.identifier
10.3926/ege2026
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/2117/454281
dc.description.abstract
According to the Paris Agreement, climate action must be based on equity. Countries had to submit their second Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) by 2025, including arguments on how the Party considers that its NDC is fair and ambitious in light of its national circumstances. This study analyses the information provided by countries in the Fairness and Ambition section of their first NDCs, focusing on the use of principles and indicators supported by international environmental law. Countries are mapped according to historical emissions per capita and GDP per capita, grouping them as Developed Countries, Developing Countries, or Least Developed Countries/Small Island Developing States. The analysis reveals that countries with the least historical responsibility and economic capacity rely most on those principles and indicators. Most countries tend to select principles favorable to their positions while avoiding those that would justify stronger mitigation efforts. Notably, developed countries generally do not base their fairness arguments on those internationally recognized principles. To enhance the robustness and comparability of arguments in NDCs, authors suggest that countries consistently report using principles aligned with international environmental law and, if possible, provide standardized indicators
dc.format
14 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
OmniaScience
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights
Open Access
dc.rights
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.subject
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Desenvolupament humà i sostenible::Desenvolupament sostenible
dc.subject
Environmental justice
dc.subject
Climate justice
dc.subject
Environmental policy
dc.subject
Justícia ambiental
dc.subject
Justícia climàtica
dc.subject
Política ambiental
dc.title
From principles to practice: Use of fairness and ambition considerations in nationally determined contributions
dc.type
Conference lecture


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Congressos [11156]