Otros/as autores/as

Institut Català de la Salut

[Petersen RS, Fijen LM] Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. [Apfelbacher C] Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. [Magerl M, Weller K] Angioedema Center of Reference and Excellence, Institute of Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany. [Aberer W] Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. [Gil-Serrano J, Guilarte M] Secció d’Al·lèrgia, Servei de Medicina Interna, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Unitat de Recerca d’Al·lèrgies, Servei d’Al·lergologia, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Fecha de publicación

2024-06-13T08:18:03Z

2024-06-13T08:18:03Z

2024-04-10



Resumen

Acute treatment; Delphi; Hereditary angioedema


Tratamiento agudo; Delphi; Angioedema hereditario


Tractament agut; Delphi; Angioedema hereditari


Background Clinical trials investigating drugs for the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks have assessed many different outcomes. This heterogeneity limits the comparability of trial results and may lead to selective outcome reporting bias and a high burden on trial participants. Objective To achieve consensus on a core outcome set composed of key outcomes that ideally should be used in all clinical efficacy trials involving the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks. Methods We conducted a Delphi consensus study involving all relevant parties: patients with hereditary angioedema, hereditary angioedema expert clinicians and clinical researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory bodies. Two Internet-based survey rounds were conducted. In round 1, panelists indicated the importance of individual outcomes used in clinical trials on a 9-point Likert scale. Based on these results, a core outcome set was developed and voted on by panelists in round 2. Results A total of 58 worldwide panelists completed both rounds. The first round demonstrated high importance scores and substantial agreement among the panelists. In the second round, a consensus of 90% or greater was achieved on a core outcome set consisting of five key outcomes: change in overall symptom severity at one predetermined time point between 15 minutes and 4 hours after treatment, time to end of progression of all symptoms, the need for rescue medication during the entire attack, impairment of daily activities, and treatment satisfaction. Conclusions This international study obtained a high level of consensus on a core outcome set for the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks, consisting of five key outcomes.

Tipo de documento

Artículo


Versión publicada

Lengua

Inglés

Publicado por

Elsevier

Documentos relacionados

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice;12(6)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.04.007

Citación recomendada

Esta citación se ha generado automáticamente.

Derechos

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)