Institut Català de la Salut
[Petersen RS, Fijen LM] Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. [Apfelbacher C] Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. [Magerl M, Weller K] Angioedema Center of Reference and Excellence, Institute of Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany. [Aberer W] Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. [Gil-Serrano J, Guilarte M] Secció d’Al·lèrgia, Servei de Medicina Interna, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Unitat de Recerca d’Al·lèrgies, Servei d’Al·lergologia, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
2024-06-13T08:18:03Z
2024-06-13T08:18:03Z
2024-04-10
Acute treatment; Delphi; Hereditary angioedema
Tratamiento agudo; Delphi; Angioedema hereditario
Tractament agut; Delphi; Angioedema hereditari
Background Clinical trials investigating drugs for the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks have assessed many different outcomes. This heterogeneity limits the comparability of trial results and may lead to selective outcome reporting bias and a high burden on trial participants. Objective To achieve consensus on a core outcome set composed of key outcomes that ideally should be used in all clinical efficacy trials involving the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks. Methods We conducted a Delphi consensus study involving all relevant parties: patients with hereditary angioedema, hereditary angioedema expert clinicians and clinical researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory bodies. Two Internet-based survey rounds were conducted. In round 1, panelists indicated the importance of individual outcomes used in clinical trials on a 9-point Likert scale. Based on these results, a core outcome set was developed and voted on by panelists in round 2. Results A total of 58 worldwide panelists completed both rounds. The first round demonstrated high importance scores and substantial agreement among the panelists. In the second round, a consensus of 90% or greater was achieved on a core outcome set consisting of five key outcomes: change in overall symptom severity at one predetermined time point between 15 minutes and 4 hours after treatment, time to end of progression of all symptoms, the need for rescue medication during the entire attack, impairment of daily activities, and treatment satisfaction. Conclusions This international study obtained a high level of consensus on a core outcome set for the acute treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks, consisting of five key outcomes.
Article
Versió publicada
Anglès
Decisió de grup; Pell - Malalties - Tractament; Al·lèrgia; Avaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària); Malalties congènites; DISEASES::Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases::Skin Diseases::Skin Diseases, Vascular::Urticaria::Angioedema::Angioedemas, Hereditary; Other subheadings::Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/drug therapy; ANALYTICAL, DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUES, AND EQUIPMENT::Diagnosis::Prognosis::Treatment Outcome; PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOLOGY::Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms::Psychology, Social::Group Processes::Consensus; ENFERMEDADES::enfermedades de la piel y tejido conjuntivo::enfermedades de la piel::enfermedades cutáneas vasculares::urticaria::angioedema::angioedemas hereditarios; Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/farmacoterapia; TÉCNICAS Y EQUIPOS ANALÍTICOS, DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS::diagnóstico::pronóstico::resultado del tratamiento; PSIQUIATRÍA Y PSICOLOGÍA::conducta y mecanismos de la conducta::psicología social::procesos de grupo::consenso
Elsevier
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice;12(6)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.04.007
Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Articles científics - VHIR [1655]