|
Title:
|
Assessing the assignation of public subsidies: Do the experts choose the most efficient R&D projects?
|
|
Author:
|
Duch Brown, Néstor; Garcia-Quevedo, Jose; Montolio, Daniel
|
|
Notes:
|
The implementation of public programs to support business R&D projects requires the establishment of a selection process. This selection process faces various difficulties, which include the measurement of the impact of the R&D projects as well as selection process optimization among projects with multiple, and sometimes incomparable, performance indicators. To this end, public agencies generally use the peer review method, which, while presenting some advantages, also demonstrates significant drawbacks. Private firms, on the other hand, tend toward more quantitative methods, such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), in their pursuit of R&D investment optimization. In this paper, the performance of a public agency peer review method of project selection is compared with an alternative DEA method. |
|
Subject(s):
|
-Recerca industrial
-Subvencions
-Avaluació d'experts
-Anàlisi cost-benefici
-Industrial research
-Subsidies
-Cost effectiveness
-Peer review |
|
Rights:
|
cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Duch Brown, et al., 2008
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
|
|
Document type:
|
Working Paper |
|
Published by:
|
Institut d’Economia de Barcelona
|
|
Share:
|
|
