dc.contributor.author
Cobos-Trigueros, Nazaret
dc.contributor.author
Solé, Mar
dc.contributor.author
Castro, Pedro
dc.contributor.author
Torres, Jorge Luis
dc.contributor.author
Rinaudo, Mariano
dc.contributor.author
Lazzari, Elisa de
dc.contributor.author
Morata, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Hernández-Munain, Cristina
dc.contributor.author
Fernández, Sara (Fernández García)
dc.contributor.author
Soriano Viladomiu, Alex
dc.contributor.author
Nicolás Arfelis, Josep Maria
dc.contributor.author
Mensa Pueyo, Josep
dc.contributor.author
Vila Estapé, Jordi
dc.contributor.author
Martínez, José Antonio (Martínez Martínez)
dc.date.issued
2016-05-19T09:52:47Z
dc.date.issued
2016-05-19T09:52:47Z
dc.date.issued
2016-03-16
dc.date.issued
2016-05-10T15:01:27Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/98675
dc.description.abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of two strategies of antibiotic
use (mixing vs. cycling) on the acquisition of resistant
microorganisms, infections and other clinical outcomes. METHODS:
Prospective cohort study in an 8-bed intensive care unit during
35- months in which a mixing-cycling policy of antipseudomonal
beta-lactams (meropenem, ceftazidime/piperacillin-tazobactam)
and fluoroquinolones was operative. Nasopharyngeal and rectal
swabs and respiratory secretions were obtained within 48h of
admission and thrice weekly thereafter. Target microorganisms
included methicillin-resistant S. aureus, vancomycin-resistant
enterococci, third-generation cephalosporin-resistant
Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenters. RESULTS: A total of 409
(42%) patients were included in mixing and 560 (58%) in cycling.
Exposure to ceftazidime/piperacillin-tazobactam and
fluoroquinolones was significantly higher in mixing while
exposure to meropenem was higher in cycling, although overall
use of antipseudomonals was not significantly different
(37.5/100 patient-days vs. 38.1/100 patient-days). There was a
barely higher acquisition rate of microorganisms during mixing,
but this difference lost its significance when the cases due to
an exogenous Burkholderia cepacia outbreak were excluded (19.3%
vs. 15.4%, OR 0.8, CI 0.5-1.1). Acquisition of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa resistant to the intervention antibiotics or with
multiple-drug resistance was similar. There were no significant
differences between mixing and cycling in the proportion of
patients acquiring any infection (16.6% vs. 14.5%, OR 0.9, CI
0.6-1.2), any infection due to target microorganisms (5.9% vs.
5.2%, OR 0.9, CI 0.5-1.5), length of stay (median 5 d for both
groups) or mortality (13.9 vs. 14.3%, OR 1.03, CI 0.7-1.3).
CONCLUSIONS: A cycling strategy of antibiotic use with a 6-week
cycle duration is similar to mixing in terms of acquisition of
resistant microorganisms, infections, length of stay and
mortality.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150274
dc.relation
PLoS One, 2016, vol. 11, num. 3, p. e0150274
dc.relation
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150274
dc.rights
cc by (c) Cobos-Trigueros et al., 2016
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (ISGlobal)
dc.subject
Infeccions del tracte urinari
dc.subject
Urinary tract infections
dc.title
Evaluation of a Mixing versus a Cycling Strategy of Antibiotic
Use in Critically-Ill Medical Patients: Impact on Acquisition of
Resistant Microorganisms and Clinical Outcomes
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion