dc.contributor.author
González Ricoy, Íñigo
dc.date.issued
2015-02-02T15:50:05Z
dc.date.issued
2015-02-02T15:50:05Z
dc.date.issued
2015-02-02T15:50:05Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/62247
dc.description.abstract
The republican case for workplace democracy (WD) is presented and defended from two alternative means of ensuring freedom from arbitrary interference in the firmnamely, (a) the right to freely exit the firm and (b) workplace regulation. This paper shows, respectively, that costless exit is neither possible nor desirable in either perfect or imperfect labor markets, and that managerial discretion is both desirable and inevitable due to the incompleteness of employment contracts and labor legislation. The paper then shows that WD is necessary, from a republican standpoint, if workers" interests are to be adequately tracked in the exercise of managerial authority. Three important objections are finally addressed (i) that WD is redundant, (ii) that it is unnecessary provided that litigation and unionism can produce similar outcomes, and (iii) that it falls short of ensuring republican freedom compared to self-employment.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Florida State University
dc.relation
Versió postprint del document publicat a:
dc.relation
Social Theory and Practice, 2014, vol. 40, num. 2, p. 232-254
dc.rights
(c) Social Theory and Practice, 2014
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)
dc.subject
Republicanisme
dc.title
The republican case for workplace democracy
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion