Predictors of cognitive decline in Alzheimer"s disease and mild cognitive impairment using the CAMCOG: a five-year follow-up

dc.contributor.author
Conde Sala, Josep Lluís
dc.contributor.author
Garre Olmo, Josep
dc.contributor.author
Vilalta Franch, Joan
dc.contributor.author
Llinàs Reglà, Jordi
dc.contributor.author
Turró-Garriga, Oriol
dc.contributor.author
Lozano Gallego, Manuela
dc.contributor.author
Hernández-Ferrándiz, Marta
dc.contributor.author
Pericot Nierga, Imma
dc.contributor.author
López Pousa, Secundino
dc.date.issued
2014-07-29T08:46:20Z
dc.date.issued
2014-07-29T08:46:20Z
dc.date.issued
2012
dc.date.issued
2014-07-29T08:46:20Z
dc.identifier
1041-6102
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/56387
dc.identifier
604794
dc.description.abstract
Background: There are discrepant findings regarding which subscales of the Cambridge Cognitive Examination(CAMCOG) are able to predict cognitive decline. The study aimed to identify the baseline CAMCOG subscales that can discriminate between patients and predict cognitive decline in Alzheimer"s disease (AD)and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: This was a five-year case-control study of patients with cognitive impairment and a control group.Participants were grouped into AD (n = 121), MCI converted to dementia (MCI-Ad, n = 43), MCI-stable(MCI-St, n = 66), and controls (CTR, n = 112). Differences in the mean scores obtained by the four groupswere examined. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare subscale scores in the AD and MCI-Ad groups with those of controls. The influence of age, gender, schooling, and depression on baseline subscale scores was assessed. Results: Of the CAMCOG subscales, Orientation and Memory (learning and recent) (OR + MEM) showed the highest discriminant capacity in the baseline analysis of the four groups. This baseline analysis indicated that OR + MEM was the best predictor of conversion to AD in the MCI-Ad group (area under the curve, AUC = 0.81), whereas the predictive capacity of the global MMSE and CAMCOG scores was poor (AUC = 0.59 and 0.53, respectively). Conclusions: In the baseline analysis, the Orientation and Memory (learning and recent) subscales showed the highest discriminant and predictive capacity as regards both cognitive decline in the AD group and conversion to AD among MCI-Ad patients. This was not affected by age, gender, schooling, or depression.
dc.format
11 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Cambridge University Press
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: doi:10.1017/S1041610211002158
dc.relation
International Psychogeriatrics, 2012, vol. 24, num. 6, p. 948-958
dc.relation
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1041610211002158
dc.rights
(c) Cambridge University Press, 2012
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Cognició, Desenvolupament i Psicologia de l'Educació)
dc.subject
Factors de risc en les malalties
dc.subject
Demència senil
dc.subject
Envelliment
dc.subject
Memòria
dc.subject
Risk factors in diseases
dc.subject
Senile dementia
dc.subject
Aging
dc.subject
Memory
dc.title
Predictors of cognitive decline in Alzheimer"s disease and mild cognitive impairment using the CAMCOG: a five-year follow-up
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.