Workplace and non-workplace loneliness: a cross-sectional comparative study on risk factors and impacts on absenteeism and mental health among employees in Spain

dc.contributor.author
Domènech Abella, Joan
dc.contributor.author
Mundó Blanch, Jordi
dc.contributor.author
Muntaner, Carles
dc.contributor.author
Haro Abad, Josep Maria
dc.date.accessioned
2026-02-20T00:25:08Z
dc.date.available
2026-02-20T00:25:08Z
dc.date.issued
2026-02-18T09:50:41Z
dc.date.issued
2026-02-18T09:50:41Z
dc.date.issued
2025-04-24
dc.date.issued
2026-02-18T09:50:41Z
dc.identifier
0933-7954
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/227001
dc.identifier
758975
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/227001
dc.description.abstract
Purpose The aim of this study is to (1) evaluate prevalences and concordance between workplace and non-workplace loneliness, (2) compare sociodemographic risk factors between workplace and non-workplace loneliness, (3) compare working conditions-related risk factors between the two contexts of loneliness, and (4) compare the impact of workplace and nonworkplace loneliness on absenteeism, depression, anxiety and substance use disorder. Methods A sample of the employee residing in Spain (n=5400) was surveyed using computer-assisted web interviews (CAWI) during August and September 2024. Logistic regression models were constructed to compare the effects of risk factors for workplace and non-workplace loneliness (including sociodemographic factors, and factors related to working conditions), as well as the association of workplace and non-workplace loneliness on absenteeism, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and substance use disorder. Results Among active workers, 40.7% report experiencing workplace loneliness, while 42.0% report non-workplace loneliness. The level of concordance between both types of loneliness is low (Kappa=0.36). Both types are more prevalent among younger and immigrant workers. Other sociodemographic risk factors (being female, non-married, and non-heterosexual) were significantly associated with non-workplace loneliness. Meanwhile, risk factors related to working conditions -particularly working under stress and labor precariousness- were associated with both types of loneliness, which showed an independent impact on absenteeism, depression, anxiety, and substance use disorder. Conclusion Most of the social determinants of workplace loneliness are rooted in the work environment, indicating that effective interventions should focus on addressing labor conditions and precariousness to improve both workplace and nonworkplace loneliness and their impacts on absenteeism and mental health.
dc.format
11 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Springer Verlag
dc.relation
Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02899-z
dc.relation
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2025, vol. 60, p. 2289-2299
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02899-z
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Domènech Abella et al., 2025
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject
Treball precari
dc.subject
Solitud
dc.subject
Absentisme laboral
dc.subject
Salut mental
dc.subject
Precarious employment
dc.subject
Solitude
dc.subject
Absenteeism (Labor)
dc.subject
Mental health
dc.title
Workplace and non-workplace loneliness: a cross-sectional comparative study on risk factors and impacts on absenteeism and mental health among employees in Spain
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Fitxers en aquest element

FitxersGrandàriaFormatVisualització

No hi ha fitxers associats a aquest element.

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)