Quantitative analysis of the brachialis and triceps brachii insertion sites on the proximal epiphysis of the ulna in modern hominid primates and fossil hominins

dc.contributor.author
Ciurana, Neus
dc.contributor.author
Casado, Aroa
dc.contributor.author
Rodríguez Corbera, Patricia
dc.contributor.author
García-Cuesta, Marcel
dc.contributor.author
Pastor, Francisco
dc.contributor.author
Potau Ginés, Josep Maria
dc.date.accessioned
2026-01-27T19:57:38Z
dc.date.available
2026-01-27T19:57:38Z
dc.date.issued
2026-01-26T16:36:00Z
dc.date.issued
2026-01-26T16:36:00Z
dc.date.issued
2024-11-03
dc.date.issued
2026-01-26T16:36:00Z
dc.identifier
0275-2565
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/226177
dc.identifier
751790
dc.identifier
39488847
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/226177
dc.description.abstract
In several species of hominid primates with different types of locomotor behavior, we quantitatively studied the insertion sites of the brachialis and triceps brachii on the proximal epiphysis of the ulna. Our main objective was to evaluate the possibility of using the anatomical features of these insertion sites to infer the locomotor behavior of different species of fossil hominins. We measured the area of these muscle insertion sites using 3D bone meshes and obtained the value of each insertion site relative to the total size of the two insertion sites for each of the species studied. We also compared these relative values of the osteological samples with the relative mass of the brachialis and triceps brachii, which we obtained by dissecting these muscles in the same primate species. The relative values for the brachialis insertion were highest in orangutans, followed by bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and humans. Fossil Australopithecus and Paranthropus had values similar to those of bonobos, while fossil Homo had values similar to those of Homo sapiens. The observed similarity in ulnar attachment sites between Australopithecus and Paranthropus and extant bonobos suggest that these hominins used arboreal locomotion to complement their bipedalism. These adaptations to arboreal locomotion were not observed in Homo.
dc.format
12 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Wiley
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23690
dc.relation
American Journal of Primatology, 2024, vol. 86, num.12
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23690
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Ciurana, Neus et al., 2024
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject
Músculs
dc.subject
Colze
dc.subject
Homínids fòssils
dc.subject
Muscles
dc.subject
Elbow
dc.subject
Fossil hominids
dc.title
Quantitative analysis of the brachialis and triceps brachii insertion sites on the proximal epiphysis of the ulna in modern hominid primates and fossil hominins
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Fitxers en aquest element

FitxersGrandàriaFormatVisualització

No hi ha fitxers associats a aquest element.

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)