Eliciting critical care nurses' beliefs regarding physical restraint use

dc.contributor.author
Via-Clavero, Gemma
dc.contributor.author
Sanjuán-Naváis, Marta
dc.contributor.author
Romero García, Marta
dc.contributor.author
Cueva Ariza, Laura de la
dc.contributor.author
Martínez Estalella, Gemma
dc.contributor.author
Plata Menchaca, Erika
dc.contributor.author
Delgado-Hito, Pilar
dc.date.accessioned
2026-01-14T21:36:22Z
dc.date.available
2026-01-14T21:36:22Z
dc.date.issued
2026-01-13T18:44:11Z
dc.date.issued
2026-01-13T18:44:11Z
dc.date.issued
2019-08-01
dc.date.issued
2026-01-13T18:44:11Z
dc.identifier
0969-7330
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/225423
dc.identifier
676290
dc.identifier
29495933
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/225423
dc.description.abstract
Background: Despite the reported harms and ethical concerns about physical restraint use in the critical care settings, nurses' intention to apply them is unequal across countries. According to the theory of planned behaviour, eliciting nurses' beliefs regarding the use of physical restraints, would provide additional social information about nurses' intention to perform this practice. Aim: To explore the salient behavioural, normative and control beliefs underlying the intention of critical care nurses to use physical restraints from the theory of planned behaviour. Research design: A belief elicitation study was conducted. Participants and research context: Twenty-six critical care nurses were purposively sampled across gender, work shift patterns and professional experience in five intensive care units of three hospitals in Spain. Data were obtained from a nine-item open-ended questionnaire and a focus group. Deductive content analysis was performed. Ethical considerations: Ethical approval was obtained from the hospital ethics committee. Participants were assured their participation was voluntary. Findings: Nurses framed the use of restraints as a way of prioritising patients' physical safety. They referred to contextual factors as the main reasons to justify their application. Nurses perceived that their decision is approved by other colleagues and the patients' relatives. Some nurses started advocating against their use, but felt powerless to change this unsafe practice within an unfavourable climate. Control beliefs were linked to patient's medical condition, availability of alternative solutions, analgo-sedation policies and work organisation. Discussion: Safety arguments based on the surrounding work environment were discussed. Conclusion: Nurses' behavioural and control beliefs were related. Nurses should be trained in alternatives to PR use. The impact of analgo-sedation protocols, relatives' involvement, leadership support and ICU restraint policies on PR practices need to be revised. Further research is required to explore why nurses do not act with moral courage to change this harmful practice. Keywords: Restraint Physical, attitude, intention, intensive care units, nurses, qualitative research.
dc.format
15 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
SAGE Publications
dc.relation
Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017752547
dc.relation
Nursing Ethics An International Journal for Health Care Professionals, 2019, vol. 26, num.5, p. 1458-1472
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017752547
dc.rights
(c) Via-Clavero,G. et al., 2019
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject
Infermeria en cures intensives
dc.subject
Unitats de cures intensives
dc.subject
Investigació qualitativa
dc.subject
Intensive care nursing
dc.subject
Intensive care units
dc.subject
Qualitative research
dc.title
Eliciting critical care nurses' beliefs regarding physical restraint use
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion


Fitxers en aquest element

FitxersGrandàriaFormatVisualització

No hi ha fitxers associats a aquest element.

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)