dc.contributor.author
Jiménez Martínez, Ester
dc.contributor.author
Bonnín Roig, Caterina del Mar
dc.contributor.author
Solé Cabezuelo, Brisa
dc.contributor.author
Sánchez-Moreno, José
dc.contributor.author
Reinares, María
dc.contributor.author
Torrent Font, Carla
dc.contributor.author
Torres, Imma
dc.contributor.author
Salagre Muñoz, Estela
dc.contributor.author
Varo, Cristina
dc.contributor.author
Ruíz, Victoria
dc.contributor.author
Giménez Palomo, Anna
dc.contributor.author
Benabarre, Antonio
dc.contributor.author
Gutiérrez-Rojas, Luis
dc.contributor.author
Cervilla, Jorge
dc.contributor.author
Sáiz Martínez, Pilar Alejandra
dc.contributor.author
García Portilla, María Paz
dc.contributor.author
Bobes García, Julio
dc.contributor.author
Amann, Benedikt L.
dc.contributor.author
Martínez-Arán, Anabel, 1971-
dc.contributor.author
Vieta i Pascual, Eduard, 1963-
dc.date.issued
2026-01-12T09:06:56Z
dc.date.issued
2026-01-12T09:06:56Z
dc.date.issued
2019-02-11
dc.date.issued
2026-01-12T09:06:56Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/225273
dc.description.abstract
Background: The Temperament Evaluation of the Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego (TEMPS-A) is a self-administered questionnaire intended to assess five affective temperaments: depressive, cyclothymic, hy-perthymic, irritable and anxious. Our objective was to examine the psychometric properties of the TEMPS-A using a sample comprised by patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and healthy controls (HC) and to determine cut-
off scores for each temperament.
Methods: Five hundred and ninety-eight individuals (327 BD and 271 HC) completed the TEMPS-A. Cronbach's alpha was used to examine internal consistency reliability. Test-retest reliability and association between different temperamental scales were assessed using Spearman correlation. To confirm factor structure a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was carried out. Cut-off scores indicating the presence of dominant temperament
were also calculated.
Results: Internal consistency was optimal for all temperament subscales (α: 0.682- 0.893). The questionnaire demonstrated good test-retest reliability (ρ: 0.594–0.754). The strongest positive associations were found between cyclothymic and anxious and between depressive and anxious temperaments. Hyperthymic and depressive as well as hyperthymic and anxious temperaments showed a strong negative correlation.
Limitations: The HC sample was not matched with the BD group. There were some sociodemographic and clinical differences between groups that may impact on the obtained results. A portion of patients with BD was recruited from tertiary centers.
Conclusions: The Spanish version of the Barcelona TEMPS-A questionnaire presents a good internal consistency and their results are stable in clinical population. The performance of the Barcelona TEMPS-A is as good as the original scale.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Elsevier B.V.
dc.relation
Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.037
dc.relation
Journal of Affective Disorders, 2019, vol. 249, p. 199-207
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.037
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier B.V., 2019
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject
Validació (Medicaments)
dc.subject
Trastorn bipolar
dc.subject
Validation (Drug manufacture)
dc.subject
Manic-depressive illness
dc.title
Spanish validation of the Barcelona TEMPS-A questionnaire in patients with bipolar disorder and general population
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion