dc.contributor.author
Nieva Fenoll, Jordi
dc.date.accessioned
2026-01-10T13:15:05Z
dc.date.available
2026-01-10T13:15:05Z
dc.date.issued
2026-01-09T13:55:21Z
dc.date.issued
2026-01-09T13:55:21Z
dc.date.issued
2022-12-01
dc.date.issued
2026-01-09T13:55:22Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/225211
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/225211
dc.description.abstract
The burden of proof, a notion specific to the medieval Roman-canonical process but alien to the four Roman procedural systems, ought to have become obsolete with the introduction of the free assessment of evidence. However, doctrinal and jurisprudential inertia in the use of traditional concepts, as well as the conservation of biphasic processes in legal systems of Anglo-Saxon origin, including the Roman-canonical process, have favoured the persistence of a notion that, when observed objectively, has ceased to have any legitimate practical value in current judicial processes.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Marcial Pons, Ediciones Jurídicas y Sociales, S.A. y U.B.
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a:
dc.relation
Revista Italoespañola de Derecho Procesal, 2022
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Jordi Nieva Fenoll, 2022
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject
Dret processal (Dret romà)
dc.subject
Evidence (Law)
dc.subject
Procedure (Roman law)
dc.title
Requiem for the burden of proof
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
