Is there really a relationship between maxillary and mandibular incisor inclination and the amount of surrounding cortical alveolar bone? A systematic review

dc.contributor.author
d'Oliveira, Nuno Gustavo
dc.contributor.author
Monill González, Anna
dc.contributor.author
Valle-Cañada, Pau
dc.contributor.author
Albaladejo, Alberto
dc.contributor.author
Curto, Adrián
dc.date.issued
2025-12-12T15:11:44Z
dc.date.issued
2025-12-12T15:11:44Z
dc.date.issued
2025-09-02
dc.date.issued
2025-12-12T15:11:44Z
dc.identifier
1472-6831
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/224868
dc.identifier
762827
dc.identifier
40898191
dc.description.abstract
Background: For orthodontists, the position of the incisors is a key factor in setting treatment goals. Achieving maximum stability requires that they be positioned in the medullary portion of the alveolar bone, balanced with the lingual and labial musculature. Incorrect orthodontic movements can result in root resorption, dehiscences, or even fenestrations. Methods: A systematic review of the bibliography was conducted in accordance with PRISMA recommendations. Searches were made in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, using the same search terms in each, with no limitation on publication data, up to July 1st, 2024. The review accepted articles in any language. Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and cohort studies were included, both retrospective and prospective. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, case series, literature reviews, and editorials were excluded. The quality of the articles was determined according to the CONSORT criteria. Results: The initial database search identified 167 articles: 89 in PubMed, 74 in Scopus, and 4 in the Cochrane Library. Of these, 75 were duplicates, leaving 92. After applying the inclusion criteria, a total of 8 articles were included in this systematic review. Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the significant relationship between alveolar bone thickness and incisor inclination as assessed by CBCT. The bone thickness varies regionally, with the maxilla generally having thicker palatal bone and the mandible having thinner labial bone. CBCT is indispensable for evaluating cases involving severe skeletal discrepancies, preexisting bone defects, or planned movements beyond the alveolar limits, while traditional methods may suffice for less complex cases. Standardizing methodologies and conducting longitudinal studies with diverse populations are crucial for improving clinical guidelines and ensuring safe, effective treatment planning.
dc.format
9 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
BioMed Central
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06751-3
dc.relation
BMC Oral Health, 2025, vol. 25
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06751-3
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Gustavo d’Oliveira, N. et al., 2025
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject
Maxil·lars
dc.subject
Teixit ossi
dc.subject
Ressenyes sistemàtiques (Investigació mèdica)
dc.subject
Jaws
dc.subject
Bone
dc.subject
Systematic reviews (Medical research)
dc.title
Is there really a relationship between maxillary and mandibular incisor inclination and the amount of surrounding cortical alveolar bone? A systematic review
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)