dc.contributor.author
Muguerza-Guevara, Kevin
dc.contributor.author
Cortés Acha, Berta
dc.contributor.author
García-García, Marta
dc.contributor.author
Barbosa de Figueiredo, Rui Pedro
dc.contributor.author
Soler-Ollé, Agnès
dc.contributor.author
Blanc, Vanessa
dc.contributor.author
Valmaseda Castellón, Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned
2025-11-19T22:01:38Z
dc.date.available
2025-11-19T22:01:38Z
dc.date.issued
2025-08-29T12:16:57Z
dc.date.issued
2025-08-29T12:16:57Z
dc.date.issued
2025-12-01
dc.date.issued
2025-08-29T12:16:57Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/222847
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/222847
dc.description.abstract
Introduction: The microbiota associated with peri-implant diseases has been described, though information about biofilm formation and development on dental implants remains scarce. Objectives: To analyze and compare biofilm formation and distribution at 24 h, 48 h and 7 days on experimental abutments simulating dental implants in peri-implant healthy patients. Material and methods: Experimental abutments with micro-threads and a modified rough surface were placed in healthy dental implants of 10 patients. Instructions were given not to clean the abutments for the duration of the study. Exclusion criteria included the use of antiseptics or antibiotics 30 days prior to recruitment or during the study period. After 24 h, 48 h and 7 days, the abutments were removed and stained using LIVE/DEAD stain, and two sides (buccal and palatal/lingual) and two areas (supragingival and subgingival) were assessed, with measurement of the mean biofilm covering area. Results: Twenty-nine experimental abutments placed in 10 patients were assessed. The total mean biomass coverage areas were 9.3%, 16.2% and 16.8% at 24 h, 48 h and 7 days, respectively, with significant differences being observed between 24 h and the subsequent timepoints (p < 0.05). Significantly greater supragingival biofilm coverage was observed at 7 days in comparison with the subgingival zone (21.85% versus 11.7%; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Biofilm coverage on healthy dental implants increases progressively during the first 48 h and then stabilizes. The biofilm is mainly composed of live cells in the supragingival and subgingival areas. After 7 days, the supragingival areas show significantly greater biofilm coverage.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
BioMed Central
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06580-4
dc.relation
BMC Oral Health, 2025, vol. 25, num.1
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06580-4
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Muguerza-Guevara, K. et al., 2025
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
dc.subject
Fisiologia cel·lular
dc.subject
Implants dentals
dc.subject
Cell physiology
dc.subject
Dental implants
dc.title
In vivo analysis of early biofilm development and cell viability on implant-mimicking abutments at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion