How Transformational Leadership Affects the Off-work Recovery of Daily Personal Energy Resources via Work Engagement: Resource and Demand-based Pathways

dc.contributor.author
Czakert, Jan Philipp
dc.contributor.author
Leiva Ureña, David
dc.contributor.author
Berger, Rita, 1959-
dc.date.issued
2025-08-01T12:18:57Z
dc.date.issued
2025-08-01T12:18:57Z
dc.date.issued
2024-04-05
dc.date.issued
2025-08-01T12:18:57Z
dc.identifier
1138-7416
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/222743
dc.identifier
748086
dc.identifier
38575505
dc.description.abstract
This study focuses on the transformational leadership-work engagement relationship by investigating resource and demand pathways for daily off-work recovery and employee wellbeing (EWB). While previous research highlighted how transformational leadership energizes employees to engage at work, energy is a finite resource requiring daily restoration for EWB. Yet, how the leader’s energizing effect relates to daily employees’ recovery remains unknown. Following job demands-resource-recovery theory, we test two pathways that relate the transformational leadership-work engagement relationship to daily employee recovery: (a) Resource-based via resource-building, (b) demand-based via increased demands. Utilizing a 10-day, two daily measurement (N = 88) study, multilevel path analyses revealed: transformational leadership predicted via work engagement (b = .17, p < .05) role clarity (b = .56, p < .01), then positive (b = .39, p < .01), and negative work-nonwork spillover (b = –.38, p < .01). Positive work-nonwork spillover predicted recovery positively (b = .25, p < .01), negative work-nonwork spillover negatively (b = –.40, p < .01). Recovery predicted EWB for positive (b = .38, p < .01) and for negative (b = –.43, p < .01) affect. Work engagement predicted workload (b = .35, p < .01), further negative (b = .33, p < .01) and positive work-nonwork spillover (b = –.16, p < .01), hampering EWB. As one pathway effect might cancel the other, the main effect of transformational leadership on EWB was not significant in the integrative model (p > .05). Results highlight dark and bright sides of the transformational leadership-work engagement relationship regarding daily recovery.
dc.format
15 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2024.12
dc.relation
The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2024, vol. 27, e11
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2024.12
dc.rights
cc by (c) Czakert, Jan Philipp et al., 2024
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa)
dc.subject
Lideratge
dc.subject
Qualitat de vida en el treball
dc.subject
Leadership
dc.subject
Quality of work life
dc.title
How Transformational Leadership Affects the Off-work Recovery of Daily Personal Energy Resources via Work Engagement: Resource and Demand-based Pathways
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)