Potential strategies for prevention of tumor spillage in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy

dc.contributor.author
Bebia, Vicente
dc.contributor.author
Monreal Clua, Sonia
dc.contributor.author
Pérez Benavente, Asunción
dc.contributor.author
Franco Camps, Silvia
dc.contributor.author
Díaz Feijoo, Berta
dc.contributor.author
Gil Moreno, Antonio
dc.date.issued
2025-06-18T16:46:11Z
dc.date.issued
2025-06-18T16:46:11Z
dc.date.issued
2020-09
dc.date.issued
2025-06-18T16:46:11Z
dc.identifier
2005-0380
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/221638
dc.identifier
724008
dc.identifier
9429900
dc.identifier
32808499
dc.description.abstract
Objective: The publication of a prospective and several retrospective studies describing a worse prognosis in patients affected with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent a minimally invasive radical hysterectomy has raised a high concern in what measures should be undertaken in order to revert these results. Potential strategies to prevent tumor spillage have been previously proposed. Methods: In this video, we describe nine strategies that should be addressed in future trials regarding this procedure. Results: These strategies are: 1. Fallopian tubes should be coagulated prior to start the surgery. 2. All sentinel lymph nodes and lymphadenectomy specimens should be obtained without lymph nodes fragmentation. 3. All surgical specimens should be extracted within a containment bag. 4. Uterine manipulators must never be used. 5. Prior to vaginal section, a closed knotted ligature should be placed around the vagina, proximal to the section line, and the remaining vaginal cavity profusely washed. 6. Once the vagina is opened, the surgical specimen should be extracted vaginally within a specimen retrieval bag. 7. After surgery, the pelvic cavity is profusely washed with physiological serum, and the vagina should be washed with iodopovidone diluted to 10%. 8. Port-site metastasis prevention measures should be performed. 9. Every action made to prevent tumor spillage should be recorded in the surgical report. Conclusion: As there is a biological rationale in these measures that would prevent tumor spillage and seeding, there is a need of prospectively exploring them within appropriate studies in order to determine their own oncological outcome.
dc.format
2 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e73
dc.relation
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2020, vol. 31, num.5
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e73
dc.rights
cc-by-nc (c) Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, 2020
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques)
dc.subject
Histerectomia
dc.subject
Càncer de coll uterí
dc.subject
Cirurgia
dc.subject
Efectes secundaris
dc.subject
Hysterectomy
dc.subject
Cervix cancer
dc.subject
Surgery
dc.subject
Side effects
dc.title
Potential strategies for prevention of tumor spillage in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.