Euclid preparation XIX. Impact of magnification on photometric galaxy clustering

Author

Lepori, F.

Tutusaus, I.

Viglione, C.

Bonvin, C.

Camera, S.

Castander, Francisco Javier

Durrer, R.

Fosalba, Pablo

Jelic-Cizmek, G.

Kunz, M.

Adamek, J.

Sefusatti, E.

Tramacere, A.

Valiviita, J.

Viel, M.

Hildebrandt, H.

Branchini, E.

Brescia, M.

Brinchmann, J.

Capobianco, V.

Carbone, C.

Serrano, S.

Carretero, J.

Castellano, M.

Cavuoti, S.

Cimatti, A.

Cledassou, R.

Congedo, G.

Conselice, C.J.

Conversi, L.

Copin, Y.

Corcione, L.

Sirignano, C.

Courbin, Frédéric

Da Silva, A.

Degaudenzi, H.

Douspis, M.

Dubath, F.

Dupac, X.

Dusini, S.

Ealet, A.

Farrens, S.

Ferriol, S.

Sirri, G.

Franceschi, E.

Fumana, M.

Garilli, B.

Gillard, W.

Gillis, B.

Giocoli, C.

Grazian, A.

Grupp, F.

Guzzo, L.

Haugan, S.V.H.

Stanco, L.

Holmes, W.

Hormuth, F.

Hudelot, P.

Jahnke, K.

Kermiche, S.

Kiessling, A.

Kilbinger, M.

Kitching, T.

Kümmel, M.

Kurki-Suonio, H.

Starck, J.-L.

Ligori, S.

Lilje, P.B.

Lloro, I.

Mansutti, O.

Marggraf, O.

Markovic, K.

Marulli, F.

Massey, R.

Maurogordato, S.

Melchior, M.

Tallada-Crespí, P.

Meneghetti, M.

Merlin, E.

Meylan, G.

Moresco, M.

Moscardini, L.

Munari, E.

Nakajima, R.

Niemi, S.M.

Padilla, C.

Paltani, S.

Taylor, A.N.

Pasian, F.

Pedersen, K.

Percival, W.J.

Pettorino, V.

Pires, S.

Poncet, M.

Popa, L.

Pozzetti, L.

Raison, F.

Rhodes, J.

Tereno, I.

Roncarelli, M.

Rossetti, E.

Saglia, R.

Schneider, P.

Secroun, A.

Seidel, G.

Euclid Collaboration

Toledo-Moreo, R.

Torradeflot, F.

Casas, S.

Valentijn, E.A.

Valenziano, L.

Wang, Yan

Weller, J.

Zamorani, G.

Zoubian, J.

Andreon, S.

Bardelli, S.

Fabbian, G.

Graciá-Carpio, J.

Martinelli, M.

Maino, D.

Medinaceli, E.

Mei, S.

Renzi, A.

Romelli, E.

Sureau, F.

Vassallo, T.

Zacchei, A.

Zucca, E.

Baccigalupi, C.

Sakr, Z.

Balaguera-Antolínez, A.

Bernardeau, F.

Biviano, A.

Blanchard, A.

Bolzonella, M.

Borgani, S.

Bozzo, E.

Burigana, C.

Cabanac, R.

Cappi, A.

Sapone, D.

Carvalho, C.S.

Castignani, G.

Colodro-Conde, C.

Coupon, J.

Courtois, H.M.

Cuby, J.-G.

Davini, S.

Torre, S. de la

Di Ferdinando, D.

Farina, M.

Amara, A.

Ferreira, P.G.

Finelli, F.

Galeotta, S.

Ganga, K.

Garcia-Bellido, J.

Gaztanaga, E.

Gozaliasl, G.

Hook, I.M.

Ilić, S.

Joachimi, B.

Auricchio, N.

Kansal, V.

Keihanen, E.

Kirkpatrick, C.C.

Lindholm, V.

Mainetti, G.

Maoli, R.

Martinet, N.

Maturi, M.

Metcalf, R.B.

Monaco, P.

Bodendorf, C.

Morgante, G.

Nightingale, J.

Nucita, A.

Patrizii, L.

Popa, V.

Potter, D.

Riccio, G.

Sánchez, A.G.

Schirmer, M.

Schultheis, M.

Bonino, D.

Scottez, V.

Publication date

2025-05-14T17:44:36Z

2025-05-14T17:44:36Z

2022

2025-05-14T17:44:36Z

Abstract

Aims. We investigate the importance of lensing magnification for estimates of galaxy clustering and its cross-correlation with shear for the photometric sample of Euclid. Using updated specifications, we study the impact of lensing magnification on the constraints and the shift in the estimation of the best fitting cosmological parameters that we expect if this effect is neglected. Methods. We follow the prescriptions of the official Euclid Fisher matrix forecast for the photometric galaxy clustering analysis and the combination of photometric clustering and cosmic shear. The slope of the luminosity function (local count slope), which regulates the amplitude of the lensing magnification, and the galaxy bias have been estimated from the Euclid Flagship simulation. Results. We find that magnification significantly affects both the best-fit estimation of cosmological parameters and the constraints in the galaxy clustering analysis of the photometric sample. In particular, including magnification in the analysis reduces the 1σ errors on Ωm,0,w0,wa at the level of 20–35%, depending on how well we will be able to independently measure the local count slope. In addition, we find that neglecting magnification in the clustering analysis leads to shifts of up to 1.6σ in the best-fit parameters. In the joint analysis of galaxy clustering, cosmic shear, and galaxy–galaxy lensing, magnification does not improve precision, but it leads to an up to 6σ bias if neglected. Therefore, for all models considered in this work, magnification has to be included in the analysis of galaxy clustering and its cross-correlation with the shear signal (3×2pt analysis) for an accurate parameter estimation.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Related items

Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142419

Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2022, vol. 662, num.A93

https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142419

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

(c) The European Southern Observatory (ESO), 2022

This item appears in the following Collection(s)