dc.contributor.author
Perez Campuzano, Valeria
dc.contributor.author
Olivas, Pol
dc.contributor.author
Ferrusquia Acosta, José
dc.contributor.author
Torres, Sonia
dc.contributor.author
Borras, Roger
dc.contributor.author
Baiges Aznar, Anna
dc.contributor.author
Orts, Lara
dc.contributor.author
Vizcarra, Pamela
dc.contributor.author
Falga, María Ángeles
dc.contributor.author
Codina, Joana
dc.contributor.author
Shalaby, Sarah
dc.contributor.author
Ojeda Gómez, Asunción
dc.contributor.author
Turon, Fanny
dc.contributor.author
Hernández Gea, Virginia
dc.contributor.author
Cárdenas Vásquez, Andrés
dc.contributor.author
García Pagán, Juan Carlos
dc.date.issued
2025-03-03T12:07:06Z
dc.date.issued
2025-03-03T12:07:06Z
dc.date.issued
2025-01-11
dc.date.issued
2025-02-25T14:51:55Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/219391
dc.description.abstract
Background and aims
Continuous infusion (CI) of terlipressin may result in a more sustained reduction in portal pressure with fewer adverse effects than administered as a bolus. This study aimed to compare the hepatic and cardiopulmonary hemodynamic effects and safety profiles of bolus vs terlipressin CI.
Methods
This is a single-center, single-blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group, clinical trial in which 38 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension were randomized to receive: 1mg bolus of terlipressin + CI of placebo (TERLBOL n=12), bolus of placebo + CI of terlipressin (2mg/day or 4mg/day if <10% reduction in hepatic venous pressures gradient (HVPG) at 30min of infusion) (TERLINF n=14) or a bolus of octreotide (50mcg) + CI of octreotide (50mcg/h) (OCTR n=12) as an additional control group. HVPG, cardiopulmonary pressures and cardiac output were measured at baseline, after 30, 60 and 120 minutes.
Results
Sixty-eight percent of patients were male, with median age 59-years. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. TERLBOL group: there was a non-significant reduction in HVPG (at 120min, -4.9%; p:0.14), however, cardiopulmonary and mean arterial pressures significantly increased, while cardiac output and heart rate significantly decreased. TERLINF group: there were non-significant changes in cardiopulmonary hemodynamics or HVPG (NS) despite doubling the infusion dose after 30min in 13/14 patients. OCTR group: there was a non-significant reduction in HVPG (at 120min, -4.9%; p:0.08) and pulmonary capillary pressure significantly decreased. All treatments were well tolerated, and no adverse events were observed.
Conclusion
There were non-significant reductions in HVPG with the three therapeutic strategies. Further investigations are warranted to determine the optimal dosing strategy for CI of Terlipressin in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.relation
Versió postprint del document publicat a:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101325
dc.relation
JHEP Reports, 2025, 101325
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101325
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Perez Campuzano, Valeria et al., 2025
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
dc.subject
Hipertensió portal
dc.subject
Cirrosi hepàtica
dc.subject
Portal hypertension
dc.subject
Hepatic cirrhosis
dc.title
Hemodynamic profile of terlipressin and octreotide in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension: A randomized, single-blind clinical trial
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion