Comparative of machine learning classification strategies for electron energy loss spectroscopy: Support vector machines and artificial neural networks

dc.contributor.author
Pozo Bueno, Daniel del
dc.contributor.author
Kepaptsoglou, Demie
dc.contributor.author
Peiró Martínez, Francisca
dc.contributor.author
Estradé Albiol, Sònia
dc.date.issued
2025-02-25T15:58:09Z
dc.date.issued
2025-02-25T15:58:09Z
dc.date.issued
2023
dc.date.issued
2025-02-25T15:58:09Z
dc.identifier
0304-3991
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/219247
dc.identifier
740051
dc.description.abstract
Machine Learning (ML) strategies applied to Scanning and conventional Transmission Electron Microscopy have become a valuable tool for analyzing the large volumes of data generated by various S/TEM techniques. In this work, we focus on Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) and study two ML techniques for classifying spectra in detail: Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Firstly, we systematically analyze the optimal configurations and architectures for ANN classifiers using random search and the treestructured Parzen estimator methods. Secondly, a new kernel strategy is introduced for the soft-margin SVMs, the cosine kernel, which offers a significant advantage over the previously studied kernels and other ML classification strategies. This kernel allows us to bypass the normalization of EEL spectra, achieving accurate classification. This result is highly relevant for the EELS community since we also assess the impact of common normalization techniques on our spectra using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP), revealing a strong bias introduced in the spectra once normalized. In order to evaluate and study both classification strategies, we focus on determining the oxidation state of transition metals through their EEL spectra, examining which feature is more suitable for oxidation state classification: the oxygen K peak or the transition metal white lines. Subsequently, we compare the resistance to energy loss shifts for both classifiers and present a strategy to improve their resistance. The results of this study suggest the use of soft-margin SVMs for simpler EELS classification tasks with a limited number of spectra, as they provide performance comparable to ANNs while requiring lower computational resources and reduced training times. Conversely, ANNs are better suited for handling complex classification problems with extensive training data.
dc.format
1 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier B.V.
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113828
dc.relation
Ultramicroscopy, 2023
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113828
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Pozo Bueno, Daniel del et al., 2023
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Enginyeria Electrònica i Biomèdica)
dc.subject
Espectroscòpia de pèrdua d'energia d'electrons
dc.subject
Oxidació
dc.subject
Metalls de transició
dc.subject
Electron energy loss spectroscopy
dc.subject
Oxidation
dc.subject
Transition metals
dc.title
Comparative of machine learning classification strategies for electron energy loss spectroscopy: Support vector machines and artificial neural networks
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.