Theory of mind in schizophrenia through a clinical liability approach: a sib-pair study.

dc.contributor.author
Giralt-López, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Miret, Salvador
dc.contributor.author
Campanera, Silvia
dc.contributor.author
Moreira Martínez, Mónica
dc.contributor.author
Sotero-Moreno, Alejandro
dc.contributor.author
Krebs, Marie Odile
dc.contributor.author
Fañanás Saura, Lourdes
dc.contributor.author
Fatjó-Vilas Mestre, Mar
dc.date.accessioned
2025-01-15T23:03:43Z
dc.date.available
2025-01-15T23:03:43Z
dc.date.issued
2025-01-14T12:52:25Z
dc.date.issued
2025-01-14T12:52:25Z
dc.date.issued
2024-12-13
dc.date.issued
2025-01-14T12:52:25Z
dc.identifier
1664-1078
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/217456
dc.identifier
753264
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/217456
dc.description.abstract
Background: Consistent findings indicate that Theory of Mind (ToM) is impaired in schizophrenia (SZ). To investigate whether such deficits are trait- or state-dependent, we investigated if ToM is modified by clinical liability markers (such as basic symptoms and psychotic-like experiences), focusing on the analysis of unaffected siblings of individuals diagnosed with SZ. Methods: The study included a total of 65 participants: 38 patients diagnosed with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder and 27 healthy siblings. ToM was assessed using the Hinting Task (HT), Basic symptoms with The Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire (FCQ), Psychotic-like-experiences with the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) and Family history with the Family Interview for Genetic Studies. Results: First, a comparison of HT performance between patients and siblings (linear mixed model adjusted for age, sex and Intelligence Quotient (IQ)) showed that patients presented lower scores than siblings (p = 0.022). These differences did not remain significant after adjusting for clinical vulnerability markers. Second, within siblings, linear regression analyses (adjusted for age, sex, IQ and family history) showed that higher FCQ Depressiveness and CAPE negative scores were related to poorer ToM performance (p = 0.007 and p = 0.032, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that clinical liability markers are valuable for delineating variations in ToM capabilities within healthy individuals. Moreover, our results indicate that ToM deficits are not solely linked to SZ but also extend to its clinical vulnerability, suggesting that ToM could serve as an endophenotypic marker. This implies that ToM could help distinguish particularly susceptible individuals from a population at risk, such as those with a genetic predisposition (siblings). Keywords: basic symptoms; endophenotype; psychotic-like experiences; schizophrenia; theory of mind; unaffected siblings.   
dc.format
10 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Frontiers Media
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391646
dc.relation
Frontiers in Psychology, 2024, vol. 15
dc.relation
https://doi.org/doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391646
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Giralt-López M. et al., 2024
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)
dc.subject
Malalties mentals
dc.subject
Esquizofrènia
dc.subject
Mental illness
dc.subject
Schizophrenia
dc.title
Theory of mind in schizophrenia through a clinical liability approach: a sib-pair study.
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)