Satisfaction and effectiveness of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous belimumab treatment in daily clinical practice

dc.contributor.author
Frade Sosa, Beatriz
dc.contributor.author
Salman Monte, Tarek Carlos
dc.contributor.author
Narváez García, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.author
Peralta, Irene
dc.contributor.author
Sandoval, Sebastian
dc.contributor.author
Magallares, Berta
dc.contributor.author
Heredia, Sergi
dc.contributor.author
Sapena, Nuria
dc.contributor.author
Riveros Frutos, Anne
dc.contributor.author
Olive, Alejandro
dc.contributor.author
Corominas, Hector
dc.contributor.author
Cortes Hernandez, Josefina
dc.contributor.author
Gómez-Puerta, José Alfredo
dc.date.issued
2024-12-02T12:42:29Z
dc.date.issued
2024-12-02T12:42:29Z
dc.date.issued
2024-03-06
dc.date.issued
2024-11-21T16:31:17Z
dc.identifier
1477-0962
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/216864
dc.identifier
9428522
dc.identifier
38446533
dc.description.abstract
Background In 2017, belimumab (BEL) was approved in subcutaneous (SQ) administration. The effectiveness after switching from intravenous (IV) to SQ and patient satisfaction in daily clinical practice has not been studied. During the pandemic, patient follow-up and treatment were significantly affected, and some patients need a change from IV to SQ. Our aim was to evaluate daily clinical practice satisfaction to SQ BEL therapy in patients previously treated IV BEL. We hypothesized that SQ BEL in SLE patients previously treated with IV BEL was similar in effectiveness and conferred higher satisfaction.Methods Observational, multicenter study, conducted in 7 reference centers in Catalonia. We included stable SLE patients (EULAR/ACR 2019) on treatment with SQ BEL and previous use of IV BEL (at least 3 months on IV BEL before switching). Since there are no well-validated tools for SQ BEL treatment satisfaction, we used RASQ-SQ, validated in patients with lymphoma who switched from IV Rituximab to SQ treatment, and modified for BEL treatment.Results Twenty-seven patients were included. The more prevalent clinical manifestations observed were related to the skin and joints and the patients had a mean baseline SLEDAI of 2.96 (SD 2.4) and SLICC score of 0.67 (SD 0.88). The median time from treatment with IV BEL before switching to SQ was 21 months (range). 84% of patients reported confidence in SQ BEL. 85.2% felt that treatment with SQ BEL was convenient or very convenient. 85% felt they had gained time with the change. 89% would recommend the SQ injection to other patients. Disease activity (mean SLEDAI) and remission rates remain stable after switching. No major new adverse effects were reported.Conclusions Overall satisfaction, satisfaction with via of administration, and satisfaction with the time taken to receive BEL were higher for SQ BEL treatment. A switching SQ strategy is a reasonable alternative for BEL patients.
dc.format
18 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
SAGE Publications
dc.relation
Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033241237560
dc.relation
Lupus, 2024, vol. 33, num. 5, p. 481-489
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033241237560
dc.rights
(c) Frade Sosa, Beatriz et al., 2024
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
dc.subject
Terapèutica
dc.subject
Lupus
dc.subject
Therapeutics
dc.subject
Lupus
dc.title
Satisfaction and effectiveness of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous belimumab treatment in daily clinical practice
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)