dc.contributor.author
Gel, Enric F. (Enric Fernández)
dc.date.issued
2024-11-19T08:45:07Z
dc.date.issued
2024-11-19T08:45:07Z
dc.date.issued
2023-12-21
dc.date.issued
2024-11-19T08:45:07Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/216591
dc.description.abstract
Recently, in response to an article of mine, Joseph C. Schmid has argued that some traditional theistic arguments for God’s unicity are problematic in that they presuppose a controversial principle and conflict with Trinitarian theology. In this article, I answer Schmid’s concerns. I defend one of the original arguments while advancing new ones, and I vindicate my abductive argument for theism over naturalism.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000713
dc.relation
Religious Studies, 2023, vol. 59, num.4, p. 836-851
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000713
dc.rights
cc by (c) Gel, Enric F., 2022
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)
dc.subject
Filosofia de la religió
dc.subject
Philosophy of religion
dc.title
'There can be only one': A response to Joseph C. Schmid
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
