dc.contributor.author
Chaurasia, Akhilanand
dc.contributor.author
Rovira Lastra, Bernat
dc.contributor.author
Khoury-Ribas, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Flores Orozco, Elan Ignacio
dc.contributor.author
Ayuso Montero, Raúl
dc.contributor.author
Martínez Gomis, Jordi
dc.date.issued
2024-09-25T16:00:21Z
dc.date.issued
2024-09-25T16:00:21Z
dc.date.issued
2023-12-01
dc.date.issued
2024-09-25T16:00:21Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/215388
dc.description.abstract
Statement of problem: The accuracy of methods used for locating occlusal contacts throughout the entire clinical procedure has been poorly studied. Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the reproducibility and criterion validity for different methods of locating occlusal contacts. Material and methods: Thirty-two adults with natural dentitions participated in this cross-sectional test-retest study. In total, occlusal contacts at maximum intercuspation were recorded by using 15 methods: silicone transillumination with Occlufast Rock (40, 50, 100, and 200 µm) and Occlufast CAD (40 and 50 µm); virtual occlusion (100, 200, 300, and 400 µm); articulating film (12-, 40-, 100-, and 200-µm-thick); and T-Scan III. Images of the occlusal records were scaled and calibrated spatially, and the occlusal contacts of the right posterior mandibular teeth were delimited by using the FIJI software program. Reproducibility was expressed as 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of the percentage of agreement in the location of the occlusal contacts between images from the test sessions against retest sessions using the same method. Criterion validity was expressed as 95% CI of the percentage of agreement in the location of the occlusal contacts between images from the test sessions against images from Occlufast Rock (criterion standard). Results: Occlufast Rock achieved 85% to 95% agreement in the location of the occlusal contacts between the 2 sessions, whereas Occlufast CAD, 200-µm articulating film, and T-Scan offered 79% to 86%, 68% to 75%, and 65% to 75% agreement, respectively. The most valid method was Occlufast CAD (74% to 80%) followed by the 200-µm articulating film (57% to 63%), 400-µm virtual occlusion (53% to 62%), 100-µm articulating film (52% to 60%), and T-Scan (48% to 56%). Conclusions: Conventional methods, such as 100- and 200-µm articulating film and digital methods, including 400 µm virtual occlusion and T-Scan, offer sufficient accuracy in locating the occlusal contacts. However, strategies are needed to improve accuracy.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.036
dc.relation
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2023, vol. 132, num.1, p. 115-122
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.036
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Chaurasia, Akhilanand et al.; Elsevier, 2023
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
dc.subject
Oclusió dental
dc.subject
Disseny assistit per ordinador
dc.subject
Dental occlusion
dc.subject
Computer-aided design
dc.title
Accuracy of digital and conventional systems in locating occlusal contacts: A clinical study
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion