Inclosure and Intolerance

dc.contributor.author
Oms Sardans, Sergi
dc.contributor.author
Zardini, Elia
dc.date.accessioned
2024-11-26T18:49:48Z
dc.date.available
2024-11-26T18:49:48Z
dc.date.issued
2024-06-25T17:27:23Z
dc.date.issued
2024-06-25T17:27:23Z
dc.date.issued
2021-05-
dc.date.issued
2024-06-25T17:27:28Z
dc.identifier
0029-4527
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/213563
dc.identifier
700756
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/213563
dc.description.abstract
[eng] Graham Priest has influentially claimed that the Sorites paradox is an Inclosure paradox, concluding that his favoured dialetheic solution to the Inclosure paradoxes should be extended to the Sorites paradox. We argue that, given Priest’s dialetheic solution to the Sorites paradox, the argument purporting to show that that paradox is an Inclosure is unsound, and discuss some issues surrounding this fact.
dc.format
12 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
University of Notre Dame
dc.relation
Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2021-0020
dc.relation
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 2021, vol. 62, num.2, p. 201-220
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2021-0020
dc.rights
(c) University of Notre Dame, 2021
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject
Veritat i mentida
dc.subject
Paradoxa
dc.subject
Materialisme dialèctic
dc.subject
Truthfulness and falsehood
dc.subject
Paradox
dc.subject
Dialectical materialism
dc.title
Inclosure and Intolerance
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)