dc.contributor.author
Seron, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Rabant, Marion
dc.contributor.author
Becker, Jan Ulrich
dc.contributor.author
Roufosse, Candice
dc.contributor.author
Bellini, Maria Irene
dc.contributor.author
Böhmig, Georg A.
dc.contributor.author
Budde, Klemens
dc.contributor.author
Diekmann, Fritz
dc.contributor.author
Glotz, Denis
dc.contributor.author
Hilbrands, Luuk
dc.contributor.author
Loupy, Alexandre
dc.contributor.author
Oberbauer, Rainer
dc.contributor.author
Pengel, Liset
dc.contributor.author
Schneeberger, Stefan
dc.contributor.author
Naesens, Maarten
dc.date.issued
2024-01-24T13:58:16Z
dc.date.issued
2024-01-24T13:58:16Z
dc.date.issued
2022-05-20
dc.date.issued
2023-07-17T13:17:18Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/206279
dc.description.abstract
The diagnosis of acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) after kidney transplantation has considerable relevance for research purposes. Its definition is primarily based on tubulointerstitial inflammation and has changed little over time; aTCMR is therefore a suitable parameter for longitudinal data comparisons. In addition, because aTCMR is managed with antirejection therapies that carry additional risks, anxieties, and costs, it is a clinically meaningful endpoint for studies. This paper reviews the history and classifications of TCMR and characterizes its potential role in clinical trials: a role that largely depends on the nature of the biopsy taken (indication vs protocol), the level of inflammation observed (e.g., borderline changes vs full TCMR), concomitant chronic lesions (chronic active TCMR), and the therapeutic intervention planned. There is ongoing variability-and ambiguity-in clinical monitoring and management of TCMR. More research, to investigate the clinical relevance of borderline changes (especially in protocol biopsies) and effective therapeutic strategies that improve graft survival rates with minimal patient morbidity, is urgently required. The present paper was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the European Medicines Agency for discussion in 2020. This paper proposes to move toward refined definitions of aTCMR and borderline changes to be included as primary endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation.Copyright © 2022 Seron, Rabant, Becker, Roufosse, Bellini, Böhmig, Budde, Diekmann, Glotz, Hilbrands, Loupy, Oberbauer, Pengel, Schneeberger and Naesens.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Frontiers Media S.A.
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2022.10135
dc.relation
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2022, vol. 35, p. 10135
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2022.10135
dc.rights
cc by (c) Seron, D. et al., 2022
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
dc.title
Proposed Definitions of T Cell-Mediated Rejection and Tubulointerstitial Inflammation as Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion