dc.contributor.author
García-Rodríguez, Ana
dc.contributor.author
Tudela, Yael
dc.contributor.author
Córdova, Henry
dc.contributor.author
Carballal, Sabela
dc.contributor.author
Ordás, Ingrid
dc.contributor.author
Moreira Ruiz, Leticia
dc.contributor.author
Vaquero, Eva
dc.contributor.author
Ortiz Zúñiga, Oswaldo
dc.contributor.author
Rivero, Liseth
dc.contributor.author
Sánchez, F. Javier
dc.contributor.author
Cuatrecasas Freixas, Miriam
dc.contributor.author
Pellisé Urquiza, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Bernal, Jorge
dc.contributor.author
Fernández Esparrach, Glòria
dc.date.issued
2023-07-26T11:24:43Z
dc.date.issued
2023-07-26T11:24:43Z
dc.date.issued
2022-09-14
dc.date.issued
2023-07-26T11:24:44Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/201189
dc.description.abstract
Background and study aims Artificial intelligence is currently able to accurately predict the histology of colorectal polyps. However, systems developed to date use complex optical technologies and have not been tested in vivo. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new deep learning-based optical diagnosis system, ATENEA, in a real clinical setting using only high-definition white light endoscopy (WLE) and to compare its performance with endoscopists. Methods ATENEA was prospectively tested in real life on consecutive polyps detected in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies at Hospital Clínic. No images were discarded, and only WLE was used. The in vivo ATENEA's prediction (adenoma vs non-adenoma) was compared with the prediction of four staff endoscopists without specific training in optical diagnosis for the study purposes. Endoscopists were blind to the ATENEA output. Histology was the gold standard. Results Ninety polyps (median size: 5 mm, range: 2-25) from 31 patients were included of which 69 (76.7 %) were adenomas. ATENEA correctly predicted the histology in 63 of 69 (91.3 %, 95 % CI: 82 %-97 %) adenomas and 12 of 21 (57.1 %, 95 % CI: 34 %-78 %) non-adenomas while endoscopists made correct predictions in 52 of 69 (75.4 %, 95 % CI: 60 %-85 %) and 20 of 21 (95.2 %, 95 % CI: 76 %-100 %), respectively. The global accuracy was 83.3 % (95 % CI: 74%-90 %) and 80 % (95 % CI: 70 %-88 %) for ATENEA and endoscopists, respectively. Conclusion ATENEA can accurately be used for in vivo characterization of colorectal polyps, enabling the endoscopist to make direct decisions. ATENEA showed a global accuracy similar to that of endoscopists despite an unsatisfactory performance for non-adenomatous lesions.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Georg Thieme Verlag
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1881-3178
dc.relation
Endoscopy International Open, 2022, vol. 10, num. 9, p. E1201-E1207
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1881-3178
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) García-Rodríguez, Ana, et al., 2022
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Fonaments Clínics)
dc.subject
Pòlips (Patologia)
dc.subject
Càncer colorectal
dc.subject
Intel·ligència artificial en medicina
dc.subject
Polyps (Pathology)
dc.subject
Colorectal cancer
dc.subject
Medical artificial intelligence
dc.title
In vivo computer-aided diagnosis of colorectal polyps using white light endoscopy
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion