Protective factors of ethical conflict during a pandemic-quali-ethics-COVID-19 research part 2: an international qualitative study

dc.contributor.author
Falcó Pegueroles, Anna M. (Anna Marta)
dc.contributor.author
Viola, Elena
dc.contributor.author
Poveda-Moral, Silvia
dc.contributor.author
Rodríguez-Martín, Dolors
dc.contributor.author
Via-Clavero, Gemma
dc.contributor.author
Barello, Serena
dc.contributor.author
Bosch Alcaraz, Alejandro
dc.contributor.author
Bonetti, Loris
dc.date.issued
2023-05-22T16:23:36Z
dc.date.issued
2023-05-22T16:23:36Z
dc.date.issued
2023-05-15
dc.date.issued
2023-05-22T16:23:36Z
dc.identifier
0962-1067
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/198271
dc.identifier
733940
dc.identifier
37190669
dc.description.abstract
Aims and Objectives: To determine which factors can be considered protective ofethical conflicts in intensive care unit healthcare professionals during a pandemic. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic gave rise to new ethical concerns in relation to the management of public health and the limitations on personal freedom. Continued exposure to ethical conflict can have a range of psychological consequences.Design: A qualitative design based on phenomenological approach.Methods: A total of 38 nurses and physicians who were regular staff members of Barcelona and Milan's public tertiary university hospitals and working in intensive care units during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Semi-structured online indepth interviews were conducted. A thematic analysis was performed by two independent researchers following the seven steps of Colaizzi's methods. We adhere COREQ guidelines.Results: One theme 'Protective factors of ethical conflict in sanitary crisis' and four subthemes emerged from the data: (1) knowledge of the infectious disease, (2) good communication environment, (3) psychological support and (4) keeping the same work team together. Conclusions: Four elements can be considered protective factors of ethical conflict for healthcare professionals during a sanitary crisis. While some of these factors have already been described, the joint identification of this set of four factors as a single element is, in itself, novel. This should help in ensuring the right mechanisms are inplace to face future pandemics and should serve to improve institutional organisation and guarantee safe and high-quality patient care in times of heath care crisis. Relevance to Clinical Practice: Future strategies for the prevention of ethical conflict during sanitary crises, pandemics or other catastrophes need to consider a set of four factors as a single element. These factors are the knowledge of the infectious disease,a good communication environment, psychological support and keeping the same work team together into joint consideration.
dc.format
13 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
John Wiley & Sons
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16754
dc.relation
Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2023, p. 1-13
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16754
dc.rights
cc by-nc-nd (c) Falcó Pegueroles, Anna M. et al., 2023
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Infermeria Fonamental i Clínica)
dc.subject
COVID-19
dc.subject
Unitats de cures intensives
dc.subject
Infermeria
dc.subject
COVID-19
dc.subject
Intensive care units
dc.subject
Nursing
dc.title
Protective factors of ethical conflict during a pandemic-quali-ethics-COVID-19 research part 2: an international qualitative study
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.