dc.contributor.author
Baeza, Inmaculada, 1970-
dc.contributor.author
Fortea, Adriana
dc.contributor.author
Ilzarbe, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Sugranyes, Gisela
dc.date.issued
2023-03-30T16:43:21Z
dc.date.issued
2023-03-30T16:43:21Z
dc.date.issued
2023-01-20
dc.date.issued
2023-03-30T16:43:21Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/196268
dc.description.abstract
Background: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) are an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment in adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). However, there is less evidence for their use in children and adolescents. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize findings regarding the effectiveness and side effects of LAIA in children and adolescents with SSD. Methods: Four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, MEDES, and Dialnet) were systematically searched for articles published between inception and 12 March, 2022, with the following inclusion criteria: (1) original articles or case reports; (2) providing data on efficacy/effectiveness or safety/tolerability of LAIA treatment in children and adolescents diagnosed with SSD (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, non-affective psychotic disorder); (3) mean age of samples ≤ 18 years; and (4) written in English or Spanish. Exclusion criteria were review articles, clinical guides, expert consensus as well as posters or oral communication in conferences. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBIS tool. Results: From 847 articles found, 13 met the inclusion criteria. These included seven single case reports or case series, four retrospective chart reviews, a 24-week open-label trial, and one observational prospective study, covering a total of 119 adolescents (aged 12-17 years) with SSD. Almost all the articles described data on second-generation LAIA (53 patients on risperidone [once every other week], 33 on paliperidone palmitate [once monthly], 10 on aripiprazole [once monthly], and two on olanzapine pamoate [once monthly]). Twenty-one patients were reported to be only on first-generation LAIAs. Non-adherence was the main reason for starting an LAIA. In all of the studies, the use of LAIAs was associated with improvement in the patients' symptoms. Conclusions: There are few studies assessing the use of LAIAs in adolescents with SSD. Overall, these treatments have suggested good effectiveness and acceptable safety and tolerability. However, we found no studies examining their use in children aged < 12 years. The problems and benefits linked to this type of antipsychotic formulation in the child and adolescent population require further study, ideally with prospective, controlled designs.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.relation
Reproducció del document situat a https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-023-00558-x
dc.relation
Pediatric Drugs, 2023, vol. 25, num. 2, p. 135-149
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-023-00558-x
dc.rights
cc-by-nc (c) Baeza, Inmaculada, 1970- et al., 2023
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject
Psicosi en els adolescents
dc.subject
Psicosi en els infants
dc.subject
Efectes secundaris dels medicaments
dc.subject
Psychoses in adolescence
dc.subject
Psychoses in children
dc.subject
Drug side effects
dc.title
What Role for Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics in Managing Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders in Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion