dc.contributor.author
Graus, Francesc
dc.contributor.author
Vogrig, Alberto
dc.contributor.author
Muñiz Castrillo, Sergio
dc.contributor.author
Prüss, Harald
dc.contributor.author
Desestret, Virginie
dc.contributor.author
Dubey, Divyanshu
dc.contributor.author
Giometto, Bruno
dc.contributor.author
Irani, Sarosh R.
dc.contributor.author
Leypoldt, Frank
dc.contributor.author
McKeon, Andrew
dc.contributor.author
Honnorat, Jerome
dc.contributor.author
Psimaras, Dimitri
dc.contributor.author
Thomas, Laure
dc.contributor.author
Antoine, Jean-Christophe G.
dc.contributor.author
Titulaer, Maarten J.
dc.contributor.author
Vedeler, Christian A.
dc.contributor.author
Verschuuren, Jan J.
dc.contributor.author
Dalmau Obrador, Josep
dc.contributor.author
Joubert, Bastien
dc.date.issued
2022-03-09T15:30:11Z
dc.date.issued
2022-03-09T15:30:11Z
dc.date.issued
2021-07-01
dc.date.issued
2022-03-08T15:30:57Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/183942
dc.description.abstract
The contemporary diagnosis of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs) requires an increasing understanding of their clinical, immunologic, and oncologic heterogeneity. The 2004 PNS criteria are partially outdated due to advances in PNS research in the last 16 years leading to the identification of new phenotypes and antibodies that have transformed the diagnostic approach to PNS. Here, we propose updated diagnostic criteria for PNS.A panel of experts developed by consensus a modified set of diagnostic PNS criteria for clinical decision making and research purposes. The panel reappraised the 2004 criteria alongside new knowledge on PNS obtained from published and unpublished data generated by the different laboratories involved in the project.The panel proposed to substitute "classical syndromes" with the term "high-risk phenotypes" for cancer and introduce the concept of "intermediate-risk phenotypes." The term "onconeural antibody" was replaced by "high risk" (>70% associated with cancer) and "intermediate risk" (30%-70% associated with cancer) antibodies. The panel classified 3 levels of evidence for PNS: definite, probable, and possible. Each level can be reached by using the PNS-Care Score, which combines clinical phenotype, antibody type, the presence or absence of cancer, and time of follow-up. With the exception of opsoclonus-myoclonus, the diagnosis of definite PNS requires the presence of high- or intermediate-risk antibodies. Specific recommendations for similar syndromes triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors are also provided.The proposed criteria and recommendations should be used to enhance the clinical care of patients with PNS and to encourage standardization of research initiatives addressing PNS.Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Wolters Kluwer on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1212/nxi.0000000000001014
dc.relation
Neurology-Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, 2021, vol 8, num 4
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1212/nxi.0000000000001014
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Graus, Francesc et al., 2021
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
dc.title
Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion