dc.contributor.author
Yan, Chuyao
dc.contributor.author
Pérez-Bellido, Alexis
dc.contributor.author
de Lange, Floris P.
dc.date.issued
2021-11-25T16:01:01Z
dc.date.issued
2021-11-25T16:01:01Z
dc.date.issued
2021-05-14
dc.date.issued
2021-11-25T16:01:02Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/181520
dc.description.abstract
A set of recent neuroimaging studies observed that the perception of an illusory shape can elicit both positive and negative feedback modulations in different parts of the early visual cortex. When three Pac-Men shapes were aligned in such a way that they created an illusory triangle (i.e., the Kanizsa illusion), neural activity in early visual cortex was enhanced in those neurons that had receptive fields that overlapped with the illusory shape but suppressed in neurons whose receptive field overlapped with the Pac-Men inducers. These results were interpreted as congruent with the predictive coding framework, in which neurons in early visual cortex enhance or suppress their activity depending on whether the top-down predictions match the bottom-up sensory inputs. However, there are several plausible alternative explanations for the activity modulations. Here we tested a recent proposal (Moors, 2015) that the activity suppression in early visual cortex during illusory shape perception reflects neural adaptation to perceptually stable input. Namely, the inducers appear perceptually stable during the illusory shape condition (discs on which a triangle is superimposed), but not during the control condition (discs that change into Pac-Men). We examined this hypothesis by manipulating the perceptual stability of inducers. When the inducers could be perceptually interpreted as persistent circles, we replicated the up- and downregulation pattern shown in previous studies. However, when the inducers could not be perceived as persistent circles, we still observed enhanced activity in neurons representing the illusory shape but the suppression of activity in neurons representing the inducers was absent. Thus our results support the hypothesis that the activity suppression in neurons representing the inducers during the Kanizsa illusion is better explained by neural adaptation to perceptually stable input than by reduced prediction error.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.5.13
dc.relation
Journal of Vision, 2021, vol. 21, num. 5, p. 13
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.5.13
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Yan, Chuyao et al., 2021
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Cognició, Desenvolupament i Psicologia de l'Educació)
dc.subject
Percepció visual
dc.subject
Psicologia cognitiva
dc.subject
Neurociència cognitiva
dc.subject
Visual perception
dc.subject
Cognitive psychology
dc.subject
Cognitive neuroscience
dc.title
Amodal completion instead of predictive coding can explain activity suppression of early visual cortex during illusory shape perception
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion