Electrophysiological underpinnings of reward processing: Are we exploiting the full potential of EEG?

dc.contributor.author
Meyer, Garance M.
dc.contributor.author
Marco Pallarés, Josep
dc.contributor.author
Boulinguez, Philippe
dc.contributor.author
Sescousse, Guillaume
dc.date.issued
2021-09-17T11:52:04Z
dc.date.issued
2021-09-17T11:52:04Z
dc.date.issued
2021-09-01
dc.date.issued
2021-09-16T08:50:44Z
dc.identifier
1053-8119
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/180101
dc.identifier
715787
dc.identifier
34403744
dc.description.abstract
Understanding how the brain processes reward is an important and complex endeavor, which has involved the use of a range of complementary neuroimaging tools, including electroencephalography (EEG). EEG has been praised for its high temporal resolution but, because the signal recorded at the scalp is a mixture of brain activities, it is often considered to have poor spatial resolution. Besides, EEG data analysis has most often relied on event-related potentials (ERPs) which cancel out non-phase locked oscillatory activity, thus limiting the functional discriminative power of EEG attainable through spectral analyses. Because these three dimensions -temporal, spatial and spectral- have been unequally leveraged in reward studies, we argue that the full potential of EEG has not been exploited. To back up our claim, we first performed a systematic survey of EEG studies assessing reward processing. Specifically, we report on the nature of the cognitive processes investigated (i.e., reward anticipation or reward outcome processing) and the methods used to collect and process the EEG data (i.e., event-related potential, time-frequency or source analyses). A total of 359 studies involving healthy subjects and the delivery of monetary rewards were surveyed. We show that reward anticipation has been overlooked (88% of studies investigated reward outcome processing, while only 24% investigated reward anticipation), and that time-frequency and source analyses (respectively reported by 19% and 12% of the studies) have not been widely adopted by the field yet, with ERPs still being the dominant methodology (92% of the studies). We argue that this focus on feedback-related ERPs provides a biased perspective on reward processing, by ignoring reward anticipation processes as well as a large part of the information contained in the EEG signal. Finally, we illustrate with selected examples how addressing these issues could benefit the field, relying on approaches combining time-frequency analyses, blind source separation and source localization.
dc.format
9 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118478
dc.relation
NeuroImage, 2021, vol. 242, p. 118478
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118478
dc.rights
cc by (c) Meyer, Garance M. et al, 2021
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Cognició, Desenvolupament i Psicologia de l'Educació)
dc.subject
Electroencefalografia
dc.subject
Estimulació del cervell
dc.subject
Electroencephalography
dc.subject
Brain stimulation
dc.title
Electrophysiological underpinnings of reward processing: Are we exploiting the full potential of EEG?
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.