Results and Lessons Learned on Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation

dc.contributor.author
Musquera i Felip, Mireia
dc.contributor.author
Peri Cusí, Lluís
dc.contributor.author
Ajami, Tarek
dc.contributor.author
Revuelta, Ignacio
dc.contributor.author
Izquierdo Reyes, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Mercader, Claudia
dc.contributor.author
Sierra, Alba
dc.contributor.author
Diekmann, Fritz
dc.contributor.author
D'Anna, Maurizio
dc.contributor.author
Monsalve, Concepción
dc.contributor.author
Alcaraz Asensio, Antonio
dc.date.issued
2021-08-31T09:38:50Z
dc.date.issued
2021-08-31T09:38:50Z
dc.date.issued
2020-09-02
dc.date.issued
2021-08-31T09:38:51Z
dc.identifier
2314-6133
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/179782
dc.identifier
707674
dc.identifier
32934965
dc.description.abstract
Introduction. Nowadays, minimally invasive surgery in kidney transplantation is a reality thanks to robotic assistance. In this paper, we describe our experience, how we developed the robotic assisted Kidney transplantation (RAKT) technique, and analyze our results. Material and Methods. This is a retrospective study of all RAKTs performed at our center between July 2015 and March 2020. We describe the donor selection, surgical technique, and analyze the surgical results and complications. A comparison between the first 20 cases and the following ones is performed. Results. During the aforementioned period, 82 living donor RAKTs were performed. The mean age was and 50 (61%) were male. Mean body mass index was and preemptive in 63.7% of cases. Right kidneys and multiple arteries were seen in 14.6% and 12.2%, respectively. Mean operative and rewarming time was and minutes, respectively. Five cases required conversion to open surgery because of abnormal kidney vascularization. Two patients required embolization for subcapsular and hypogastric artery bleeding without repercussion. Three kidneys were lost, two of them due to acute rejection and one because venous thrombosis. Late complications requiring surgery included one kidney artery stenosis, one ureteral stenosis, two lymphoceles, and three hernia repairs. We noticed a significant reduction in time between the first 20 cases and the following ones from to (). With a mean follow-up time of 1.8 years (SD 1.3), the mean creatinine was 1.52 (SD 0.7) and RAKT graft survival was 98%. Conclusions. The robotic approach is an attractive, minimally invasive method for kidney transplantation, yielding good results. Further studies are needed to consider it a standard approach.
dc.format
8 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Hindawi
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8687907
dc.relation
BioMed Research International, 2020, vol. 2020, num. 8687907
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8687907
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Musquera i Felip, Mireia et al., 2020
dc.rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques)
dc.subject
Trasplantament hepàtic
dc.subject
Robòtica en medicina
dc.subject
Hepatic transplantation
dc.subject
Robotics in medicine
dc.title
Results and Lessons Learned on Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Fitxers en aquest element

FitxersGrandàriaFormatVisualització

No hi ha fitxers associats a aquest element.

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)