dc.contributor.author
García-Carpintero, Manuel
dc.date.issued
2021-04-26T14:08:59Z
dc.date.issued
2021-04-26T14:08:59Z
dc.date.issued
2021-04-26T14:08:59Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/176736
dc.description.abstract
In the core chapters 4-6, Iacona (2018) argues against the 'Uniqueness Thesis' (UT), stating that 'there is a unique notion of logical form that fulfils both the logical role and the semantic role' (39), where the former 'concerns the formal explanation of logical properties and logical relations, such as validity or contradiction' (37), and the latter 'concerns the formulation of a compositional theory of meaning' (ibid.). He argues for this on the basis of relations of coreference among referential expressions, names and indexicals. From what I take to be a fundamental agreement on most relevant issues, here I will nonetheless press him to clarify the notions of intrinsicness and the logical and semantic role of logical form on which he relies.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Universidade de Lisboa
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2020-0013
dc.relation
Disputatio, 2020, vol. XII, num. 58, p. 265-276
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2020-0013
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd (c) García-Carpintero, Manuel, 2020
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)
dc.subject
Filosofia del llenguatge
dc.subject
Anàfora (Lingüística)
dc.subject
Referència (Lingüística)
dc.subject
Philosophy of language
dc.subject
Anaphora (Linguistics)
dc.subject
Reference (Linguistics)
dc.title
Anaphoric Dependence and Logical Form
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion