Placing Cognitive Rigidity in Interpersonal Context in Psychosis: Relationship With Low Cognitive Reserve and High Self-Certainty

dc.contributor.author
García Mieres, Helena
dc.contributor.author
Usall i Rodié, Judith
dc.contributor.author
Feixas i Viaplana, Guillem
dc.contributor.author
Ochoa Güerre, Susana
dc.date.issued
2021-04-22T13:06:12Z
dc.date.issued
2021-04-22T13:06:12Z
dc.date.issued
2020-11-26
dc.date.issued
2021-04-22T13:06:12Z
dc.identifier
1664-0640
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/176646
dc.identifier
710044
dc.identifier
33324260
dc.description.abstract
Introduction: People with psychosis show impairments in cognitive flexibility, a phenomenon that is still poorly understood. In this study, we tested if there were differences in cognitive and metacognitive processes related to rigidity in patients with psychosis. We compared individuals with dichotomous interpersonal thinking and those with flexible interpersonal thinking. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis using two groups with psychosis, one with low levels of dichotomous interpersonal thinking (n = 42) and the other with high levels of dichotomous interpersonal thinking (n = 43). The patients were classified by splitting interpersonal dichotomous thinking (measured using the repertory grid technique) to the median. The groups were administered a sociodemographic questionnaire, a semi-structured interview to assess psychotic symptoms [Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)], a self-report of cognitive insight [Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)], neurocognitive tasks [Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)], and the repertory grid technique. We used a logistic regression model to test which factors best differentiate the two groups. Results: The group with high dichotomous interpersonal thinking had earlier age at onset of the psychotic disorder, higher self-certainty, impaired executive functioning, affected abstract thinking, and lower estimated cognitive reserve than the group with flexible thinking. According to the logistic regression model, estimated cognitive reserve and self-certainty were the variables that better differentiated between the two groups. Conclusion: Cognitive rigidity may be a generalized bias that affects not only neurocognitive and metacognitive processes but also the sense of self and significant others. Patients with more dichotomous interpersonal thinking might benefit from interventions that target this cognitive bias on an integrative way and that is adapted to their general level of cognitive abilities.
dc.format
9 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Frontiers Media
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.594840
dc.relation
Frontiers In Psychiatry, 2020, vol. 11, p. 594840
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.594840
dc.rights
cc-by (c) García Mieres, Helena et al., 2020
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Clínica i Psicobiologia)
dc.subject
Esquizofrènia
dc.subject
Cognició
dc.subject
Psicosi
dc.subject
Schizophrenia
dc.subject
Cognition
dc.subject
Psychoses
dc.title
Placing Cognitive Rigidity in Interpersonal Context in Psychosis: Relationship With Low Cognitive Reserve and High Self-Certainty
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)