dc.contributor.author
García-Basteiro, Alberto L.
dc.contributor.author
Hurtado, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.author
Castillo, Paola
dc.contributor.author
Fernandes, Fabiola
dc.contributor.author
Navarro, Mireia
dc.contributor.author
Lovane, Lucilia
dc.contributor.author
Casas, Isaac
dc.contributor.author
Quintó, Llorenç
dc.contributor.author
Jordao, Dercio
dc.contributor.author
Smail, Mamudo Rafik
dc.contributor.author
Lorenzoni, Cesaltina
dc.contributor.author
Carrilho, Carla
dc.contributor.author
Sanz, Ariadna
dc.contributor.author
Rakislova, Natalia
dc.contributor.author
Mira, Aurea
dc.contributor.author
Álvarez Martínez, Míriam
dc.contributor.author
Cossa, Anelsio
dc.contributor.author
Cobelens, Frank
dc.contributor.author
Mandomando, Inácio
dc.contributor.author
Vila Estapé, Jordi
dc.contributor.author
Bassat Orellana, Quique
dc.contributor.author
Menéndez, Clara
dc.contributor.author
Ordi i Majà, Jaume
dc.contributor.author
Martínez Yoldi, Miguel Julián
dc.date.issued
2021-03-18T10:42:48Z
dc.date.issued
2021-03-18T10:42:48Z
dc.date.issued
2021-07-11
dc.date.issued
2021-03-18T10:42:48Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/175296
dc.description.abstract
An estimated 1.5 million deaths were attributable to TB in 2018.1 However, some uncertainty exists as to the exact global figures, given that approximately 30% of incident cases are not diagnosed, and because of the difficulties of ascertaining TB as cause of death (CoD).2 Undoubtedly, complete diagnostic autopsies (CDAs) constitute the gold standard for establishing a diagnosis of TB at death. However, CDAs are seldom performed in high-TB-burden countries because of the scarcity of trained pathologists, the time-consuming nature of the procedure, and the meager acceptability of the practice by relatives.3 In recent years, an alternative minimally invasive autopsy (MIA), a procedure well accepted by the next of kin, has been developed.4 ,5 MIA can be conducted relatively rapidly with the use of biopsy needles for sampling key organs, which leave barely visible marks, which is thus more acceptable to relatives. This method has shown good sensitivity for diagnosing TB as CoD.6 Nonetheless, MIA has thus far used standard histological and microbiological approaches for TB diagnosis (identification of granulomatous lesions, acid-fast bacilli smears, in-house polymerase chain reaction methods),7 which remain time consuming, require specific expertise, and have limited sensitivity. Thus, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the molecular Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (hereafter referred to as Xpert Ultra) assay in samples obtained by MIA to detect CoD by TB.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
American College of Chest Physicians
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.071
dc.relation
Chest, 2021, vol. 159, num. 1, p. 103-107
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.071
dc.rights
(c) cc-by García Basteiro et. al., 2021
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Fonaments Clínics)
dc.subject
Reacció en cadena de la polimerasa
dc.subject
Polymerase chain reaction
dc.title
Performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay for determining cause of death by tuberculosis in tissue samples obtained by minimally invasive autopsies
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion