dc.contributor.author
Garmendia, Onintza
dc.contributor.author
Rodríguez Lazaro, Miguel A.
dc.contributor.author
Otero Díaz, Jorge
dc.contributor.author
Phan, Phuong
dc.contributor.author
Stoyanova, Alexandrina Petrova
dc.contributor.author
Dinh-Xuan, Anh Tuan
dc.contributor.author
Gozal, David
dc.contributor.author
Navajas Navarro, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Montserrat, Josep M.
dc.contributor.author
Farré Ventura, Ramon
dc.date.issued
2021-01-11T15:13:13Z
dc.date.issued
2021-01-11T15:13:13Z
dc.date.issued
2021-01-11T15:13:13Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/173053
dc.description.abstract
Aim: Current pricing of commercial mechanical ventilators in low-/middle-income countries (LMICs) markedly restricts their availability, and consequently a considerable number of patients with acute/chronic respiratory failure cannot be adequately treated. Our aim was to design and test an affordable and easy-to- build noninvasive bilevel pressure ventilator to allow a reduction in the serious shortage of ventilators in LMICs. Methods: The ventilator was built using off-the-shelf materials available via e-commerce and was based on a high-pressure blower, two pressure transducers and an Arduino Nano controller with a digital display (total retail cost <75 USD), with construction details provided open source for free replication. The ventilator was evaluated, and compared with a commercially available device (Lumis 150 ventilator; Resmed, San Diego, CA, USA): 1) in the bench setting using an actively breathing patient simulator mimicking a range of obstructive/restrictive diseases; and b) in 12 healthy volunteers wearing high airway resistance and thoracic/abdominal bands to mimic obstructive/restrictive patients. Results: The designed ventilator provided inspiratory/expiratory pressures up to 20/10cmH2O, respectively, with no faulty triggering or cycling; both in the bench test and in volunteers. The breathing difficulty score rated (1-10 scale) by the loaded breathing subjects was significantly (p<0.005) decreased from 5.45±1.68 without support to 2.83±1.66 when using the prototype ventilator, which showed no difference with the commercial device (2.80±1.48; p=1.000). Conclusion: The low-cost, easy-to-build noninvasive ventilator performs similarly to a high-quality commercial device, with its open-source hardware description, which will allow for free replication and use in LMICs, facilitating application of this life-saving therapy to patients who otherwise could not be treated.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
European Respiratory Society
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00846-2020
dc.relation
European Respiratory Journal, 2020, vol. 55, num. 6, p. 2000846
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00846-2020
dc.rights
cc by-nc (c) European Respiratory Society, 2020
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Economia)
dc.subject
Insuficiència respiratòria
dc.subject
Respiratory insufficiency
dc.title
Low-cost, easy-to-build noninvasive pressure support ventilator for under-resourced regions: open source hardware description, performance and feasibility testing
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion