Postoperative infections after dental implant placement: Variables associated with increased risk of failure

dc.contributor.author
Camps Font, Octavi
dc.contributor.author
Martín-Fatás, Pablo
dc.contributor.author
Clé-Ovejero, Adrià
dc.contributor.author
Barbosa de Figueiredo, Rui Pedro
dc.contributor.author
Gay Escoda, Cosme
dc.contributor.author
Valmaseda Castellón, Eduardo
dc.date.issued
2019-11-26T16:10:40Z
dc.date.issued
2019-11-26T16:10:40Z
dc.date.issued
2018-09-02
dc.date.issued
2019-11-26T16:10:41Z
dc.identifier
0022-3492
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/145439
dc.identifier
682509
dc.identifier
29797721
dc.description.abstract
Background: wound infections after dental implant placement are a rare finding that might lead to early implant failure. However, the available information on this topic is scarce. Methods: this retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine factors that may increase the failure rate of dental implants that presented a postoperative infection during the osseointegration period. Postoperative infections were defined as the presence of pus or fistula in the surgical area, with pain or tenderness, swelling, redness, and heat or fever, before prosthetic loading. A bivariate and multivariate analysis of the data using Cox proportional-hazards regression was performed to detect prognostic factors for implant failure in patients that suffer infections. Results: the patient-based prevalence of postoperative infections after implant placement was 2.80% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 2.04% to 3.83%). Thirty-three out of 37 (89.19%) patients with infections had to be surgically retreated because of antibiotic failure and 65% of the infected implants were removed. The bivariate analysis showed a significant association between implant failure and the collar surface (HR: 3.12; 95% CI: 1.16 to 8.41; P = 0.014). Cox proportional-hazards regression indicated that rough-surfaced collars increased 2.35 times the likelihood of failure (95% CI: 0.87 to 6.37; P = 0.071). Conclusions: the survival of implants placed in the maxilla, with smooth collar, and late-onset of infection was higher than those placed in the mandible, with a rough collar and early onset of infection. In general, signs of infection after dental implant placement compromises the survival rate of the affected fixtures.
dc.format
9 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
spa
dc.publisher
American Academy of Periodontology
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0024
dc.relation
Journal of Periodontology, 2018, vol. 89, num. 10, p. 1165-1173
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0024
dc.rights
(c) American Academy of Periodontology, 2018
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
dc.subject
Implants dentals
dc.subject
Període postoperatori
dc.subject
Pronòstic mèdic
dc.subject
Infeccions quirúrgiques
dc.subject
Anàlisi de supervivència (Biometria)
dc.subject
Dental implants
dc.subject
Postoperative period
dc.subject
Prognosis
dc.subject
Surgical wound infection
dc.subject
Survival analysis (Biometry)
dc.title
Postoperative infections after dental implant placement: Variables associated with increased risk of failure
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)