dc.contributor.author
García-Carpintero, Manuel
dc.date.issued
2019-11-11T13:41:23Z
dc.date.issued
2021-09-30T05:10:21Z
dc.date.issued
2019-11-11T13:41:23Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/144471
dc.description.abstract
The author of this paper contrasts the account he favor for how fictions can convey knowledge with Green's views on the topic. On the author's account, fictions can convey knowledge because fictional works make assertions and other acts such as conjectures, suppositions, or acts of putting forward contents for our consideration; and the mechanism through which they do it is that of speech act indirection, of which conversational implicatures are a particular case. There are two potential points of disagreement with Green in this proposal. First, it requires that assertions can be made indirectly. Second, it requires that verbal fiction-making doesn't consist merely in 'acts of speech', but in sui generis speech acts.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.relation
Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-09603013
dc.relation
Grazer Philosophische Studien, 2019, vol. 96, num. 3
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-09603013
dc.rights
(c) Brill, 2019
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)
dc.subject
Filosofia del llenguatge
dc.subject
Teoria de les ficcions
dc.subject
Estil indirecte
dc.subject
Actes de parla (Lingüística)
dc.subject
Philosophy of language
dc.subject
Theory of fictions
dc.subject
Reported speech
dc.subject
Speech acts (Linguistics)
dc.title
Assertions in Fictions. An Indirect Speech Act Account
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion