dc.contributor.author
Jarius, S.
dc.contributor.author
Paul, F.
dc.contributor.author
Aktas, Orhan
dc.contributor.author
Asgari, Nasrin
dc.contributor.author
Dale, Russell C.
dc.contributor.author
Seze, J. de
dc.contributor.author
Franciotta, Diego
dc.contributor.author
Fujihara, Kazuo
dc.contributor.author
Jacob, Anu
dc.contributor.author
Kim, H. J.
dc.contributor.author
Kleiter, Ingo
dc.contributor.author
Kümpfel, Tania
dc.contributor.author
Levy, Michael
dc.contributor.author
Palace, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.author
Ruprecht, Klemens
dc.contributor.author
Saiz Hinarejos, Albert
dc.contributor.author
Trebst, Corinna
dc.contributor.author
Weinshenker, Brian G.
dc.contributor.author
Wildemann, Brigitte
dc.date.issued
2019-05-20T15:39:37Z
dc.date.issued
2019-05-20T15:39:37Z
dc.date.issued
2018-05-03
dc.date.issued
2019-05-20T15:39:37Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/133483
dc.description.abstract
Over the past few years, new-generation cell-based assays have demonstrated a robust association of autoantibodies to full-length human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) with (mostly recurrent) optic neuritis, myelitis and brainstem encephalitis, as well as with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like presentations. Most experts now consider MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM) a disease entity in its own right, immunopathogenetically distinct from both classic multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Owing to a substantial overlap in clinicoradiological presentation, MOG-EM was often unwittingly misdiagnosed as MS in the past. Accordingly, increasing numbers of patients with suspected or established MS are currently being tested for MOG-IgG. However, screening of large unselected cohorts for rare biomarkers can significantly reduce the positive predictive value of a test. To lessen the hazard of overdiagnosing MOG-EM, which may lead to inappropriate treatment, more selective criteria for MOG-IgG testing are urgently needed. In this paper, we propose indications for MOG-IgG testing based on expert consensus. In addition, we give a list of conditions atypical for MOG-EM ('red flags') that should prompt physicians to challenge a positive MOG-IgG test result. Finally, we provide recommendations regarding assay methodology, specimen sampling and data interpretation.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
BioMed Central
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1144-2
dc.relation
Journal of Neuroinflammation, 2018, vol. 15, num. 1
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1144-2
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Jarius, S. et al., 2018
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject
Esclerosi múltiple
dc.subject
Malalties del sistema nerviós central
dc.subject
Multiple sclerosis
dc.subject
Central nervous system diseases
dc.title
MOG encephalomyelitis: international recommendations on diagnosis and antibody testing
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion