2018-10-09T14:54:57Z
2018-10-09T14:54:57Z
2018
The question of whether private organisations can outperform public ones in public service delivery has been a major topic of interest over the last few decades. However, empirical evidence does not systematically support the hypothesis of lower costs and higher efficiency when private organisations deliver public services. To better understand the cost and efficiency differences of public and private organisations, we conduct a meta-regression analysis of econometric studies relating to hospital ownership and performance. We analyse 61 estimations extracted from health studies using public versus private hospital costs and efficiency as an independent variable. Our analysis shows a genuine true effect in favour of public sector hospitals. We found evidence that public production of health services may be cheaper if this is provided by the public sector. However, the results show that when technical efficiency is considered, the private sector performs better than the public counterpart. And the opposite happens when instead of considering technical efficiency we consider financial costs. We discuss how the divergence in the results is affected by factors such as country, year, use of panel data in the study, whether performance is measured by examining financial costs, or if the study considers not-for-profit hospitals, among others.
Working document
English
Gestió hospitalària; Cost de l'assistència sanitària; Anàlisi de regressió; Hospital administration; Cost of medical care; Regression analysis
Universitat de Barcelona. Facultat d'Economia i Empresa
Reproducció del document publicat a: http://www.ub.edu/irea/working_papers/2018/201824.pdf
IREA – Working Papers, 2018, IR18/24
[WP E-IR18/24]
cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Bel i Queralt et al., 2018
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/