Immunosuppression and Chagas disease: a management challenge

dc.contributor.author
Pinazo, Maria-Jesus
dc.contributor.author
Espinosa Garriga, Gerard
dc.contributor.author
Cortes-Lletget, Cristina
dc.contributor.author
Posada, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.author
Aldasoro, Edelweiss
dc.contributor.author
Oliveira Souto, Inés
dc.contributor.author
Muñoz Gutiérrez, José
dc.contributor.author
Gállego Culleré, M. (Montserrat)
dc.contributor.author
Gascón i Brustenga, Joaquim
dc.date.issued
2018-09-04T15:21:09Z
dc.date.issued
2018-09-04T15:21:09Z
dc.date.issued
2013-01-17
dc.date.issued
2018-09-04T15:21:09Z
dc.identifier
1935-2735
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/124270
dc.identifier
650966
dc.identifier
23349998
dc.description.abstract
Immunosuppression, which has become an increasingly relevant clinical condition in the last 50 years, modifies the natural history of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in most patients with Chagas disease. The main goal in this setting is to prevent the consequences of reactivation of T. cruzi infection by close monitoring. We analyze the relationship between Chagas disease and three immunosuppressant conditions, including a description of clinical cases seen at our center, a brief review of the literature, and recommendations for the management of these patients based on our experience and on the data in the literature. T. cruzi infection is considered an opportunistic parasitic infection indicative of AIDS, and clinical manifestations of reactivation are more severe than in acute Chagas disease. Parasitemia is the most important defining feature of reactivation. Treatment with benznidazole and/or nifurtimox is strongly recommended in such cases. It seems reasonable to administer trypanocidal treatment only to asymptomatic immunosuppressed patients with detectable parasitemia, and/or patients with clinically defined reactivation. Specific treatment for Chagas disease does not appear to be related to a higher incidence of neoplasms, and a direct role of T. cruzi in the etiology of neoplastic disease has not been confirmed. Systemic immunosuppressive diseases or immunosuppressants can modify the natural course of T. cruzi infection. Immunosuppressive doses of corticosteroids have not been associated with higher rates of reactivation of Chagas disease. Despite a lack of evidence-based data, treatment with benznidazole or nifurtimox should be initiated before immunosuppression where possible to reduce the risk of reactivation. Timely antiparasitic treatment with benznidazole and nifurtimox (or with posaconazole in cases of therapeutic failure) has proven to be highly effective in preventing Chagas disease reactivation, even if such treatment has not been formally incorporated into management protocols for immunosuppressed patients. International consensus guidelines based on expert opinion would greatly contribute to standardizing the management of immunosuppressed patients with Chagas disease.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001965
dc.relation
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2013, vol. 7, num. 1, p. e1965
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001965
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/261495/EU//COHEMI
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Pinazo, María Jesús et al., 2013
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia, Sanitat i Medi Ambient)
dc.subject
Malaltia de Chagas
dc.subject
Immunosupressió
dc.subject
Chagas' disease
dc.subject
Immunosuppression
dc.title
Immunosuppression and Chagas disease: a management challenge
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)